STOP. RELYING. ON. THE. UNITED. STATES. AND. ITS. ECONOMIC. SYSTEM. Build and trade amongst yourselves instead of relying on this house of cards. Buy European. Buy Canadian.
'Lake America' makes one thing clear: We can't trust U.S. tech companies
21–30 of 60 posts
Re: 'Lake America' makes one thing clear: We can't trust U.S. tech companies
#22Also, I was curious, so I looked it up: Congress passed a law (Public Law 80-242) in 1947 that allowed the executive branch to establish a single set of geographic names.
Conservatives famously protested when the Obama administration renamed Mt. McKinley to Denali. I have no doubt that when a Democratic administration returns to power, they will rename a bunch of stuff, now that the precedence is set.
My guess is we're going to go through a ping-pong of renames before the law gets changed to require some kind of independent group, or a super-majority of senators or something.
Re: 'Lake America' makes one thing clear: We can't trust U.S. tech companies
#23Re: 'Lake America' makes one thing clear: We can't trust U.S. tech companies
#24The executive orders are ridiculous/childish/whatever-you-call-this. That aside, if they have any legal effect, I’d expect a map company to call a feature by its legal name. Should a rendering of the land bordering the Southwest corner of the Black Sea show the city of Istanbul? Or must it remain depicted as Constantinople? Or perhaps even Byzantium?
Re: 'Lake America' makes one thing clear: We can't trust U.S. tech companies
#25The executive orders are ridiculous/childish/whatever-you-call-this. That aside, if they have any legal effect, I’d expect a map company to call a feature by its legal name. Should a rendering of the land bordering the Southwest corner of the Black Sea show the city of Istanbul? Or must it remain depicted as Constantinople? Or perhaps even Byzantium?
Is it legally one lake with two names, or two lakes with one name?
What should customers in neither country see displayed? What if the federal government renames New Mexico to New America, but the state government refuses?
Re: 'Lake America' makes one thing clear: We can't trust U.S. tech companies
#26Earlier quoted context omitted.
> It’s extremely disruptive, but blaming Google or Apple for any of this is a bad move, imo They have the capacity to push back, instead of pre-emptively rolling over for an autocrat.
Google and Apple don’t name things. If the official name inside the US is Lake America, they are only hurting their users by delaying the change, as the map will no longer be in line with the reality the users are living in and things they need to look up. When it’s only one thing, you might say everyone just knows, but that doesn’t scale. And like I mentioned, they need to pick their battles. I’d rather them save th…
Re: 'Lake America' makes one thing clear: We can't trust U.S. tech companies
#27They could have done the same right? They probably even have a team specifically for evading the law
Re: 'Lake America' makes one thing clear: We can't trust U.S. tech companies
#28Personally I believe you cannot trust the US Gov. since Citizens United. This seems not only to allow the rich to purchase politicians, but under Trump it allows the current administration to extort companies. So, companies can easily pay Trump for favors with out any consequences, but they just need to keep the money train going and kowtow to Trump's insane whims.
At first they were saying it's just Trump, they get it
As it has carried on and on conversations have veered into "the people of that country are not reliable and intelligent global partners or the American system truly is a dystopian mess"
Re: 'Lake America' makes one thing clear: We can't trust U.S. tech companies
#29Earlier quoted context omitted.
That is not helpful. That makes them only useful as windsocks, and there are other far better ways to see which way the wind is blowing.
If you want symbolic resistance I suggest you look to sources other than multinational corporations for it. Their job is to make money and not stick their foot in any bear traps, our job is to not elect maniacs multiple times. Lets not cross the streams just because it would be convenient this time ... next time it may well not be.
A core principle of authoritarianism is to get people, corporations, and institutions to yield to the despot's — comply in advance, retell the despot's lies, applaud the despot's ridiculous new clothes.
Anything not doing that provides permission for others to also refuse.
The entire principle of authoritarianism is it is too costly for a small number of people to resist, so the activation energy never happens. That is why they swat down one "bee" so hard, because if a million "bees" get together, they are done.
Supporting any person or corporation who resists is legit, as is refusing to support those who comply.
And the idea that corporations are only responsible for "shareholder value" and have zero responsibility to the people or society which literally sustains them is BS; just a mantra to justify running corporations like sociopaths.
Re: 'Lake America' makes one thing clear: We can't trust U.S. tech companies
#30STOP. RELYING. ON. THE. UNITED. STATES. AND. ITS. ECONOMIC. SYSTEM. Build and trade amongst yourselves instead of relying on this house of cards. Buy European. Buy Canadian.
As an American, I wonder if Trump succeeds in giving away so much of America's economic and military power to other countries, will it make America a less interesting target for corrupting interests? Maybe the billionaires and foreign governments will invest less money in corrupting our system if it's not the global hegemon?