Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

ChatGPT Images 2.5

openai.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

291–300 of 474 posts

Re: ChatGPT Images 2.5

#291

Post by seventhtiger »

cobolcomesback wrote: post #256
bluegatty wrote: post #144

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This an oddly cynical comment, that I think says more about the observer than the observed. People are having fun making images. Like they do all sorts of things on the web. Making an image is as simple as visiting a web-page. That's it.

Yea, “fun”, sure. I’m sure none of those billions of images were used to lie, mislead, or cheat anyone. I’m sure none of those images were used to create fake news narratives, used in advertisements to bait people into buying fake products, or create misleading mockups of rental properties. Definitely not. Nevermind the fact that the examples in OpenAI’s blog post are examples of creating images that have no plausibl…

Knives are freely sold at shops on every street.

Re: ChatGPT Images 2.5

#292

Post by vunderba »

benatkin wrote: post #120

Earlier today I couldn't get ChatGPT to draw a horse on the moon. Idea taken from Stable Diffusion's wikipedia page. I tried three times with that prompt, "a photograph of an astronaut riding a horse" and again with a horse on the moon. I got it to do another image. However, the original prompt just worked, though it didn't happen to choose the moon, it didn't say the moon. Edit: finally, I have my horse on the moon.…

That’s surprising even gpt-image-1 was able to handle the equestrian astronaut prompt pretty trivially, albeit yellow-tinged as all hell.

For the heck of it, I ratcheted up the difficulty of the prompt (two-headed horse, astronaut with the visor up, etc.), and gpt-image-2 got it right every time.

https://imgpb.com/HwDVcJo

Re: ChatGPT Images 2.5

#293

Post by moomoo11 »

bahmboo wrote: post #109
conradludgate wrote: post #18

[flagged]

Groan. Your comment is the most depressing thing I've read today. What a sad way to look at the world. People are doing stuff and having fun. Meanwhile a whole sub-cult is sucking from the doom straw and mumbling carbon, water, greed, blah. The sport of Golf consumes far more resources than any AI data center.

I just ignore most of these people. 99.9% of the time they're losers who peddle misinformation.

Re: ChatGPT Images 2.5

#294

Post by swader999 »

jddj wrote: post #288
nozzlegear wrote: post #275

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How so? I don't have twitter or reddit, what are people doing?

If my social circle (in real life) is anything to go by, mostly testing out home renovation/decoration ideas.

I make my brother look older and plumper in most pics he sends me. It makes me laugh.

Re: ChatGPT Images 2.5

#295

Post by cholantesh »

rustystump wrote: post #214
bluegatty wrote: post #144

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This an oddly cynical comment, that I think says more about the observer than the observed. People are having fun making images. Like they do all sorts of things on the web. Making an image is as simple as visiting a web-page. That's it.

this is an oddly dismissive comment that says more about the commenter then what is commented on. generating an ai image is vastly more costly than loading a webpage…but still not that costly compared to most other things. this is depressing in the same way content slop or fyp feeds are fun. if you want a silly pic with ur kids, just pay someone on fiver. it will be only slightly more expensive and likely far more ex…

>if you want a silly pic with ur kids, just pay someone on fiver. it will be only slightly more expensive and likely far more exciting for kids as they have to wait for the dopamine hit.

Or, y'know, learn how to draw, or accept that it's not exactly going to be Chuck Jones caliber stuff.

Re: ChatGPT Images 2.5

#297

Post by arjie »

paimapi wrote: post #271
arjie wrote: post #143

Earlier quoted context omitted.

So every day the people of Vermont emit more CO2 just commuting than all image generation through OpenAI per week. Nice. That does put it in perspective. It’s really efficient.

yep, what our climate really needs is another carbon emitter similar to an entire state's worth of vehicles just so people can not pay artists or make dumb images of themselves ripping off some artistic style like Studio Ghibli. that is so much more of a social good than people being able to make it to work and earn a living

Oh I think paying people to make 3 billion images would result in far more carbon emissions. Just think about how much CO2 a human emits while painting. The paint, the food. Just for the sake of the climate I would never pay an artist for something like this.

Re: ChatGPT Images 2.5

#298

Post by swader999 »

nozzlegear wrote: post #280
cobolcomesback wrote: post #256

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yea, “fun”, sure. I’m sure none of those billions of images were used to lie, mislead, or cheat anyone. I’m sure none of those images were used to create fake news narratives, used in advertisements to bait people into buying fake products, or create misleading mockups of rental properties. Definitely not. Nevermind the fact that the examples in OpenAI’s blog post are examples of creating images that have no plausibl…

Yesterday my wife used ChatGPT to generate an image of our cat as a toilet, which was very funny for the both of us. She's also used it to turn him into a basketball getting dunked, a tsetse fly, a clown and a napkin. It's hard to say whether she uses it more to generate inside joke images about our cat, or to generate mockup plans and layouts for her flower gardens, but it is safe to say she does it all for fun.

This was routed internally to CatGPT which runs only Vera ribbon.

Re: ChatGPT Images 2.5

#299

Post by lefty2 »

Even GPT Images 2.0 was already the best image generator that I have tried, however it has one massive disadvantage: draconian censorship. Even rendering a gun in a scene will get flagged as "violent" and I need to create a battle scene... there's no way to do that with the censorship the way it is

Re: ChatGPT Images 2.5

#300

Post by well_ackshually »

dinfinity wrote: post #265
well_ackshually wrote: post #249

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>People are having fun making images. 3 billion images per week isn't people, it's automated farms, dogshit marketing companies and other attacks on your brain.

All of it? What percentage is benign? Do you have a source?

[flagged]
Post reply on HN