Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

ChatGPT Images 2.5

openai.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

241–250 of 472 posts

Re: ChatGPT Images 2.5

#241

Post by WarmWash »

LinXitoW wrote: post #112
vlyan wrote: post #48

Earlier quoted context omitted.

would you like a carbon receipt for your video gaems, netflix, and reddit sessions?

Bad examples. Use meat consumption. It will blow any other kind of "non-essential" resource use out of the water, on ALL fronts. It's really hard to believe that people care about the personal impact of their decisions, when it's only ever other peoples decisions that get talked about.

Meat is particularly ironic because it uses an obscene amount of water. Even worse, a lot of the feed for cattle comes from the imperial valley in CA, which has first dibs on the Colorado River, which is on the verge of collapsing. Obviously they aren't cutting usage.

But datacenters using water is what the public needs to fear...

Re: ChatGPT Images 2.5

#242

Post by DrammBA »

bluegatty wrote: post #144
conradludgate wrote: post #18

[flagged]

This an oddly cynical comment, that I think says more about the observer than the observed. People are having fun making images. Like they do all sorts of things on the web. Making an image is as simple as visiting a web-page. That's it.

If twitter and reddit have demonstrated anything is that the fun people are having with image generation is not healthy.

Re: ChatGPT Images 2.5

#243

Post by raincole »

jjcm wrote: post #205

I use gpt image 2 very heavily for my current project (ai UI design tool). The biggest improvement I'm seeing with this is in speed. I've generated around 50k images with gpt-image-2 via api, the the average latency has held at around 104s. It's wild how much of a difference this is - images are coming in at around 35-40s. Very noticable, and makes a difference when you're iterating quickly: https://jjcm.org/gpt-imag…

I'm confused. Isn't diffui using its own model?

Re: ChatGPT Images 2.5

#244

Post by jjcm »

jjcm wrote: post #205

I use gpt image 2 very heavily for my current project (ai UI design tool). The biggest improvement I'm seeing with this is in speed. I've generated around 50k images with gpt-image-2 via api, the the average latency has held at around 104s. It's wild how much of a difference this is - images are coming in at around 35-40s. Very noticable, and makes a difference when you're iterating quickly: https://jjcm.org/gpt-imag…

Some UI tests with it:

Warcraft 3 style agentic dev interface: https://image.non.io/cd9ea5cd-8ed7-44e0-ad3f-480ff0e51875.we...

Overall it used the reference images I gave it a bit better than gpt-image-2. I noticed 2 had issues getting the blue button just right. 2.5 nailed it.

A "John Politics" meme site: https://image.non.io/d2922164-fa96-4d07-a141-2febadb02939.we...

Did very well modifying the pose while keeping the appearance of Glenn Powell. gpt-image-2 had a lot of the "fried" look for some of his skin in prior designs I did for johnpolitics.com

A cyberpunk inspired ramen website: https://image.non.io/8d5d8f10-0f0f-4d91-b5ea-33af7538b150.we...

Dark mode sites surfaced the fried look quite a bit in prior models, but this definitely looks better on that front. One thing that looks perhaps worse though is the microglyphs - note the teal lines to the bottom right of the ramen, they're kinda blurry / not straight.

Overall fixed some of the main issues / gripes I had with gpt-image-2

Re: ChatGPT Images 2.5

#245

Post by WarmWash »

magicalist wrote: post #216
visarga wrote: post #113

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I am wondering if in 2-3 years AI will be heads and shoulders above us in both images and text. Then will we continue to see the slop accusations? Maybe its slop is better than most of our work.

> Then will we continue to see the slop accusations? If it doesn't look like the food you're about to purchase, yes? Why is this even a question in this context.

"Here is a picture of the dish, make it look nicer and use that as a reference"

Re: ChatGPT Images 2.5

#247

Post by strangecasts »

magicalist wrote: post #216
visarga wrote: post #113

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I am wondering if in 2-3 years AI will be heads and shoulders above us in both images and text. Then will we continue to see the slop accusations? Maybe its slop is better than most of our work.

> Then will we continue to see the slop accusations? If it doesn't look like the food you're about to purchase, yes? Why is this even a question in this context.

Yes, even though fast food places would previously use every food photography trick in the book to make the food look good, there was at least some relation between the menu and what you actually get, which people just seem completely fine with dispensing because the affordances of image generators work against including product photography

(Have also heard about people - not just scammers/spam operations - using generated pictures and descriptions for dating profiles and real estate ads, and I cannot understand what outcome they expect when someone follows up and immediately realizes what's up)

Re: ChatGPT Images 2.5

#248

Post by willchis »

vlyan wrote: post #48
recitedropper wrote: post #38

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The sheer waste that accompanies image and video genAI is actually terrifying. I challenge OpenAI to put a "your carbon footprint" field next to each generation. If you have nothing to hide, more information is surely better, right?

would you like a carbon receipt for your video gaems, netflix, and reddit sessions?

_This comment increased sea levels by 0.000000000003m_

Re: ChatGPT Images 2.5

#249

Post by well_ackshually »

bluegatty wrote: post #144
conradludgate wrote: post #18

[flagged]

This an oddly cynical comment, that I think says more about the observer than the observed. People are having fun making images. Like they do all sorts of things on the web. Making an image is as simple as visiting a web-page. That's it.

>People are having fun making images.

3 billion images per week isn't people, it's automated farms, dogshit marketing companies and other attacks on your brain.

Re: ChatGPT Images 2.5

#250

Post by vunderba »

gpt5 wrote: post #173
vunderba wrote: post #84

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You can get semi-decent sprite work out of GenAI models, but you still have to put in some manual work (scale normalization, palette reduction, grid alignments, etc). It's definitely not "out-of-the-box" yet. https://mordenstar.com/other/hobbes-animation

Really nice share. I bet you could automate the manual work with today's models

Yeah, I think you’re right. I think the hardest part would honestly be maintaining some level of consistency as your project grows its number of assets - otherwise there's no sense of a common stylistic theme.

The agentic tooling in some of the latest models is getting pretty crazy too - somebody on Reddit recently shared an example of using GPT-6 Astra to generate sprites with Aseprite, an open-source, popular pixel art editor and it worked shockingly well.

Post reply on HN