Live data from Hacker News

ChatGPT Images 2.5

openai.com

181–190 of 474 posts

Re: ChatGPT Images 2.5

#181
post #165

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Okay, but firstly golf is probably the most useless sport ever and secondly there is more than one AI datacenter. Yes, some people have fun, but most of the "fun" nowadays is just endless mindless consumption.

Golf consumes more water than ALL datacenters on earth.

But they both consume too much water. That's why we need less of both. Much less golf courses though.

Re: ChatGPT Images 2.5

#182

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This an oddly cynical comment, that I think says more about the observer than the observed. People are having fun making images. Like they do all sorts of things on the web. Making an image is as simple as visiting a web-page. That's it.

> That's it. Yeah ignoring the massive environmental, social, and moral implications I suppose it’s not a big deal at all.

The 'environmental' consideration is much less than the argument over 'paper or plastic'.

That's going to be an issue of regulation and cost - not some arbitrary decision over 'whether I should make an image or just use text'.

Second - there are really not much in the way 'social or moral implications' for the most part.

This is a dystopian delusion that I'm hinting at here.

Folks are blowing this way out of proportion, and cynically so.

People now have 'automated Photoshop' and a slightly more power to express themselves. It's not going to change that much, and it's not a bad thing, it's a good thing. Mildly.

Re: ChatGPT Images 2.5

#183

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Having a lot of fun with my son using an image of him and dressing him in all kinds of costumes. How is that depressing to you?

I wouldn't feel comfortable uploading a picture of my child to OpenAI servers (for fun nonetheless), but you do you.

I'm not following the news. Why should we not upload pictures of family members to OpenAI? Are any other cloud providers safe?

Re: ChatGPT Images 2.5

#184

[flagged]

This an oddly cynical comment, that I think says more about the observer than the observed. People are having fun making images. Like they do all sorts of things on the web. Making an image is as simple as visiting a web-page. That's it.

I hate it because I hate having to look at these AI generated images. In fact I want an internet where I have to explicitly opt-in to see AI generated content in general.

Re: ChatGPT Images 2.5

#185

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The sheer waste that accompanies image and video genAI is actually terrifying. I challenge OpenAI to put a "your carbon footprint" field next to each generation. If you have nothing to hide, more information is surely better, right?

Every SDXL image uses something like 0.5 Watt-hour. That means that 2000 sdxl images uses about 30 cents of electricity. If we multiply that by 30x for video (a fair assumption for models like minimax H3, which take that much longer to make video), that means you get almost 700 5-second videos for a dollar of electricity, which is about a kilo of carbon dioxide. More or less depending on where your electricity comes…

No way gpt-image-2 is as cheap as SDXL. (I dont concern about gpt-image-2's consumption either, just pointing out it's not a good comparison)

Re: ChatGPT Images 2.5

#187

The "composite party photo", while impressive, shows that still the miniscule details are being lost, like the teeth structure of the guy in the middle or the fact that the guy on the left is holding the cup with three fingers. Wondering why they chose this edit for the showcase.

Haha yes, I immediately saw the fingers and was surprised 'cos I thought that was something they had "solved" by now

Maybe it's like how spammers intentionally make their emails more obvious, because they have a very specific target audience.

Re: ChatGPT Images 2.5

#188

I've really enjoyed using AI to generate images. For example, Long time ago, I read an amazing five-book saga called Riverworld, and I used AI to recreate many scenes, places, and ideas from the story. Seeing the books come to life through hundreds of images was a great experience. Definitely one of the coolest things to enjoy in 2026. Try it with your favorite books.

[flagged]

We’ve outsourced everything else.

Re: ChatGPT Images 2.5

#189
post #48

Earlier quoted context omitted.

would you like a carbon receipt for your video gaems, netflix, and reddit sessions?

Someone needs to name this fallacy. The existence of existing harmful norms does not, ex ante, justify introducing additional harmful norms. I propose naming it the "GenAI Defender Fallacy". Separately--yes, I would love carbon receipts for everything. Such a system would be fascinating and do real good in this world.

selective outrage, on the other hand, already has a name.

Re: ChatGPT Images 2.5

#190

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> That's it. Yeah ignoring the massive environmental, social, and moral implications I suppose it’s not a big deal at all.

The 'environmental' consideration is much less than the argument over 'paper or plastic'. That's going to be an issue of regulation and cost - not some arbitrary decision over 'whether I should make an image or just use text'. Second - there are really not much in the way 'social or moral implications' for the most part. This is a dystopian delusion that I'm hinting at here. Folks are blowing this way out of proporti…

[dead]
Post reply on HN