Live data from Hacker News

ChatGPT Images 2.5

openai.com

121–130 of 473 posts

Re: ChatGPT Images 2.5

#121
post #48

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The sheer waste that accompanies image and video genAI is actually terrifying. I challenge OpenAI to put a "your carbon footprint" field next to each generation. If you have nothing to hide, more information is surely better, right?

would you like a carbon receipt for your video gaems, netflix, and reddit sessions?

[deleted]

Re: ChatGPT Images 2.5

#122

I've really enjoyed using AI to generate images. For example, Long time ago, I read an amazing five-book saga called Riverworld, and I used AI to recreate many scenes, places, and ideas from the story. Seeing the books come to life through hundreds of images was a great experience. Definitely one of the coolest things to enjoy in 2026. Try it with your favorite books.

One man's treasure is another man's trash

Re: ChatGPT Images 2.5

#123

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Having a lot of fun with my son using an image of him and dressing him in all kinds of costumes. How is that depressing to you?

If you're not familiar of the pitfalls of this tech, and the fact that there are more ethical tools with which to do those things, I'm not sure what to tell you.

What are some of the more ethical tools? I would like to check them out

Re: ChatGPT Images 2.5

#124
post #94

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Many people still think AI images output the wrong number of fingers on a regular basis. There's literally an image of a dude with 3 fingers in the Composite Party Photo.

So this is a valid point (and I admit I eat crow on my earlier statement), but not for that reason. In that photo, there are three fingers in front of the cup, but you would not expect 5 fingers because the way humans hold cups, the thumb will be occluded by the cup itself. That said, I don't think there is a way to hold a cup with both thumb and index occluded, so the correct number of fingers would be 4 in that cas…

[deleted]

Re: ChatGPT Images 2.5

#125

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Someone needs to name this fallacy. The existence of existing harmful norms does not, ex ante, justify introducing additional harmful norms. I propose naming it the "GenAI Defender Fallacy". Separately--yes, I would love carbon receipts for everything. Such a system would be fascinating and do real good in this world.

Considering that especially leftists have spent literal decades hating on vegans for telling them about their individual footprint, there is no real fallacy here. AI haters have somehow discovered personal responsibility. Awesome. They've never ever applied that to anything else they PERSONALLY do, though. It's only things others do. For any personal choices, suddenly it's all the governments fault or the corporation…

I can acknowledge that I should be vegan and still be unable/unwilling to make the sacrifices to do it.

People are flawed.

Re: ChatGPT Images 2.5

#126
post #110

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If they wanna loose customers...

Why do you care what your kebab shop uses for their menus? These people are trying to run a business. If this can allow them to clearly communicate prices in a well designed pleasant way, it's great. Why must they slave away in design and technology or pay someone to do it for them? I think it's great

I care, the same way I wont read your blog, if you use AI photos. Same mechanism.

Re: ChatGPT Images 2.5

#127

Omg, I love how the first examples just show how easy you can fake things. Fake being at a party with your friends. Didn't make your bed, no problem, just fake it. The sad part is my mother would love "remixing" my old child photos of me.

> Omg, I love how the first examples just show how easy you can fake things. Fake being at a party with your friends. Didn't make your bed, no problem, just fake it.

Well, that's like the entire point of social media anyway, isn't it? People there will _love_ this. Ugh ...

Re: ChatGPT Images 2.5

#128
post #75
post #48

Earlier quoted context omitted.

would you like a carbon receipt for your video gaems, netflix, and reddit sessions?

If said game, video, or social media site used 1-2.5 kWh of electricity for every 10s of content then I'd say definitely! Thankfully web browsing is no where near that.

Do you have a source for 1-2.5kWh for 10s of content? It takes about a minute or two to generate, so you'd be talking about a GPU consuming 30_000W-150_000W, it's just not possible. Even if it was distributed (which I don't think it is), that'd be 30-100 datacenter GPUs running at 100% to generate one clip? There's no way that would make financial sense.

Re: ChatGPT Images 2.5

#129

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Groan. Your comment is the most depressing thing I've read today. What a sad way to look at the world. People are doing stuff and having fun. Meanwhile a whole sub-cult is sucking from the doom straw and mumbling carbon, water, greed, blah. The sport of Golf consumes far more resources than any AI data center.

Okay, but firstly golf is probably the most useless sport ever and secondly there is more than one AI datacenter. Yes, some people have fun, but most of the "fun" nowadays is just endless mindless consumption.

How people derive fun is different from person to person.

Re: ChatGPT Images 2.5

#130

[flagged]

Groan. Your comment is the most depressing thing I've read today. What a sad way to look at the world. People are doing stuff and having fun. Meanwhile a whole sub-cult is sucking from the doom straw and mumbling carbon, water, greed, blah. The sport of Golf consumes far more resources than any AI data center.

Remind me what golf club comes close to the energy consumption of a data center?

Or do you literally mean the entire sport of golf vs 1 data center?

Post reply on HN