I heard the most ridiculous thing the other day: That GenZ and Gen Alpha have started doing this thing they call “private podcasting”. Where they invite a friend over and discuss topics like one of those podcasts where dudes just talk about stuff…but they don’t record it or post it anywhere. I was stunned. Is this generation really so socially starved by the attention parasites that human beings are starting to reinv…
It's a joke poking fun at podcast bros.
Getting your hands dirty is good for you
71–80 of 216 posts
Re: Getting your hands dirty is good for you
#72The mechanism is somewhat dubious imho - why would dirt selectively have beneficial bacteria that other environments don’t? I could come up with some just-so stories about how more “virulent” (haha) bacteria are the only ones to conquer our more sterile world but it’s just a plausible tale. I do subscribe to it myself but not out of evidence. It’s just vibes. Built my daughter a little dirt box with grass and edible…
It’s not dirt, it’s soil. Soil is a living ecosystem.
Re: Getting your hands dirty is good for you
#73The mechanism is somewhat dubious imho - why would dirt selectively have beneficial bacteria that other environments don’t? I could come up with some just-so stories about how more “virulent” (haha) bacteria are the only ones to conquer our more sterile world but it’s just a plausible tale. I do subscribe to it myself but not out of evidence. It’s just vibes. Built my daughter a little dirt box with grass and edible…
It’s not dirt, it’s soil. Soil is a living ecosystem.
Or, to put it a different way,
> Cars have windows and can go. Houses have windows and can’t go. So it’s not the windows that make the car go
Re: Getting your hands dirty is good for you
#74The mechanism is somewhat dubious imho - why would dirt selectively have beneficial bacteria that other environments don’t? I could come up with some just-so stories about how more “virulent” (haha) bacteria are the only ones to conquer our more sterile world but it’s just a plausible tale. I do subscribe to it myself but not out of evidence. It’s just vibes. Built my daughter a little dirt box with grass and edible…
Re: Getting your hands dirty is good for you
#75The mechanism is somewhat dubious imho - why would dirt selectively have beneficial bacteria that other environments don’t? I could come up with some just-so stories about how more “virulent” (haha) bacteria are the only ones to conquer our more sterile world but it’s just a plausible tale. I do subscribe to it myself but not out of evidence. It’s just vibes. Built my daughter a little dirt box with grass and edible…
If it's just you and one species of bacteria, you're closer to a circumstance that would call for the activation of such behavior than if diversity is high.
So it's not that the bacteria are intrinsically good or bad, but that the different circumstances call for calm or aggressive behavior, and all your friends going missing cues aggressiveness in species who have evolved by filling that niche in the past.
Re: Getting your hands dirty is good for you
#76I have gotten weird rashes on my hands after working in the garden, so maybe it's not all good all the time.
Re: Getting your hands dirty is good for you
#77Earlier quoted context omitted.
> it has nothing to do with regular germs! You're severely misunderstanding how germs and infections work. But germphobes have the phobia as a response to stress, its never a logical position they take. You're feelings rule your intellect on this one I'm afraid, that's a textbook definition of irrationally
Simlle question: i see dozens animals shitting on the same spot every day. Next day I see a child playing at that spot, should a say something? Is that an overreaction?
Re: Getting your hands dirty is good for you
#78The mechanism is somewhat dubious imho - why would dirt selectively have beneficial bacteria that other environments don’t? I could come up with some just-so stories about how more “virulent” (haha) bacteria are the only ones to conquer our more sterile world but it’s just a plausible tale. I do subscribe to it myself but not out of evidence. It’s just vibes. Built my daughter a little dirt box with grass and edible…
For one it's just competition. If you have regular contact to a diverse set of microorganisms chances are higher that they will keep each other populations in check. The dose makes the poison applies here too in some narrow sense.
Additionally (or even mainly) our immune system always on guard (me/not me) gets to play around with the obvious stuff and not be overwhelmed or be "bored" but constantly trained/tamed. We have evolved to have constant contact to a diverse set of microorganisms which modulate our immune system e.g. through toll-like receptors.
As an extreme case some people develop some natural immunity to the tetanus toxin through regular exposure to a extreme variety of microorganisms, obviously this isn't reliable nor a gamble remotely worth the risk.
[0]https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3980089/
[1]https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6827147/
Edit: don't know why OP gets downvoted it's a perfectly fine entrance question/bafflement to motivate some deeper digging into microbiology/immunology.
Re: Getting your hands dirty is good for you
#79... Wasn't there papers and articles showing getting in contact with soil was causing Parkinson's? Feeling some pâro, again: https://youtu.be/w7l2hUp0CkQ
I thought that was related to the insecticides/herbicides, not soil itself.
https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2001/sep/23/medicalscience.wo...
My point was more that articles like the one on the BBC (or the Guardian for that matter) just contradict themselves every year. I completely stopped reading those "pop science" takes that are only there for clicks.
(To its credit, the Guardian makes place for long form articles that go more in-depth on known knowns and known unknowns.)