Earlier quoted context omitted.
So what? The article describes the political implications of the Census Bureau errors. I cited the Census Bureau release itself so you can cross-check whether the factual assertions in the article are accurate.
The article describes political implications, and also implies political causes. So it's useful to identify this as not something a journalist or credible outlet would actually put their name to.
Why? And is the bottom line point wrong?
Gemini, citing a Pew Research study, seems to agree that Republicans lost 3-5 seats due to apportionment errors: https://share.google/aimode/9yPrkEU1U08abPWzF
> An independent analysis by the Pew Research Center and election data experts calculated exactly how those specific errors altered the final map. If the census had perfectly matched the PES estimates, the seats would have shifted as follows: [table showing apportionment errors cost Texas and Florida 1 seat each, and gave Minnesota, Rhode Island, and New York 1 undeserved seat each.
Fucking up 5 House seats for a decade seems like a firing-worthy offense.