Why would you ever connect a TV to the internet in the first place?
1. Onboarding tells you to
2. Convenience
3. Cheaper than buying an Apple TV et al
216M Spy TVs – The LG Smart TV Problem [video]
751–760 of 1001 posts
Re: 216M Spy TVs – The LG Smart TV Problem [video]
#752I wonder how many politicians, police, etc have these TVs and how sanguine they would be to find out all their conversations near the TVs have been recorded
Re: 216M Spy TVs – The LG Smart TV Problem [video]
#753Earlier quoted context omitted.
> I think it's usually not malice, it's incompetence. Sufficiently advanced incompetence is indistinguishable from malice, and should be treated accordingly.
> Sufficiently advanced incompetence is indistinguishable from malice, and should be treated accordingly. I disagree with this as stated. Maybe in the right context you could make a case for it, but in general? Heck no. Intent matters a great deal, and there is no justice in treating someone incompetent (or negligent) the same as someone who is actually malicious. Both things are bad, but the latter is worse than the…
[deleted]
Re: 216M Spy TVs – The LG Smart TV Problem [video]
#754Reminder: you can connect it to your network, but block it from the internet at the router. That way you can still use Airplay/Chromecast.
I have an LG. Great OLED panel. It's never seen the internet.
Re: 216M Spy TVs – The LG Smart TV Problem [video]
#755Sceptre dumb TV bros still winning
Re: 216M Spy TVs – The LG Smart TV Problem [video]
#756Why would you ever connect a TV to the internet in the first place?
[dead]
Re: 216M Spy TVs – The LG Smart TV Problem [video]
#757Here are LG's contract terms for appliances.[1] They are awful. Not only can they listen in. You have a contractual requirement to tell everyone in range of an appliance that they may be eavesdropped upon. CONSENT REQUIREMENT: You acknowledge and agree that it is your sole responsibility to obtain all necessary consents from any third parties whose voices may be captured by the Product and to notify household members…
What's absurd is that this doesn't void the terms by default. There should be limits to what companies can put in their ToS beyond which those terms aren't enforceable.
There are limits. You can’t waive certain rights, and you can’t overwrite certain laws.
The issue is that we haven’t made this shit against the law yet.
Re: 216M Spy TVs – The LG Smart TV Problem [video]
#758Why would you ever connect a TV to the internet in the first place?
How do you know that not connecting it is sufficient to stop the spying?
There are a few large IoT-focused networks like Amazon Sidewalk where conceivably the smart TV could connect to them if you don't connect it to your home wifi. I believe many ISPs like Xfinity also runs shared public wifi from their routers - a tv could connect via your neighbor's ISP-provided router and you wouldn't have any idea.
Re: 216M Spy TVs – The LG Smart TV Problem [video]
#759Stuff like smart TVs always go in their own VLAN on my home network. Not because I don't trust the manufacturer, but I cannot be bothered to babysit some Android device on my LAN that I'll keep using years after end-of-support.
Re: 216M Spy TVs – The LG Smart TV Problem [video]
#760Earlier quoted context omitted.
> you have to use the Latch app to open your apartment door So what happens if you arrive home with a dead phone? And possibly worse, they have a log of when you come and go?
You have a unique code, don't they already have a log of your coming and goings? But I would absolutely not install an app for that.
Usually smart lock does not have network connection(due to using battery).
But the app on your phone does not have that limitation.