'You Can See Everything' Review: Nathan Fielder's Doc About Elizabeth Holmes

> But the more Holmes talks to Fielder, the more he teases out her unhinged rationale, which is: The device works fine! We just had to figure out that pesky chemistry stuff! The strange thing is that Holmes has such a corporate mindset that she treats the chemistry stuff…that hadn’t been invented yet…as just another glitchy small problem that could easily be solved

The difference between science and engineering right there...

Re: 'You Can See Everything' Review: Nathan Fielder's Doc About Elizabeth Holmes

#5

Post by petesergeant » Mon, Sep 07, 2026, 10:14 AM UTC

saimiam wrote: post #3

Who’s “Bobby” mentioned in the article? Did the writer just mix up Billy Evans with Bobby?

It does seem that way, half-way through they switch from "Billy" to "Bobby"

Re: 'You Can See Everything' Review: Nathan Fielder's Doc About Elizabeth Holmes

#6

Post by s_dev » Mon, Sep 07, 2026, 10:17 AM UTC

nl wrote: post #4

> But the more Holmes talks to Fielder, the more he teases out her unhinged rationale, which is: The device works fine! We just had to figure out that pesky chemistry stuff! The strange thing is that Holmes has such a corporate mindset that she treats the chemistry stuff…that hadn’t been invented yet…as just another glitchy small problem that could easily be solved The difference between science and engineering right…

You mean marketing and engineering.

Re: 'You Can See Everything' Review: Nathan Fielder's Doc About Elizabeth Holmes

#7

Post by jiaosdjf » Mon, Sep 07, 2026, 10:30 AM UTC

I watched the entire trailer fully believing that Nathan Fielder had managed to find the most unhinged uncanny look-alike actress to play Elizabeth Holmes.

This trailer was so good that I would have been fully prepared to watch a 2 hour dramatised mockumentary about Theranos.

Finding out that this was really Elizabeth Holmes was a huge shock

Re: 'You Can See Everything' Review: Nathan Fielder's Doc About Elizabeth Holmes

#8

Post by Citizen_Lame » Mon, Sep 07, 2026, 10:34 AM UTC

saimiam wrote: post #3

Who’s “Bobby” mentioned in the article? Did the writer just mix up Billy Evans with Bobby?

[flagged]

Re: 'You Can See Everything' Review: Nathan Fielder's Doc About Elizabeth Holmes

#9

Post by TheOtherHobbes » Mon, Sep 07, 2026, 10:49 AM UTC

s_dev wrote: post #6

nl wrote: post #4

> But the more Holmes talks to Fielder, the more he teases out her unhinged rationale, which is: The device works fine! We just had to figure out that pesky chemistry stuff! The strange thing is that Holmes has such a corporate mindset that she treats the chemistry stuff…that hadn’t been invented yet…as just another glitchy small problem that could easily be solved The difference between science and engineering right…

You mean marketing and engineering.

Management and engineering.

Re: 'You Can See Everything' Review: Nathan Fielder's Doc About Elizabeth Holmes

#10

Post by sevenseacat » Mon, Sep 07, 2026, 10:55 AM UTC

jiaosdjf wrote: post #7

I watched the entire trailer fully believing that Nathan Fielder had managed to find the most unhinged uncanny look-alike actress to play Elizabeth Holmes. This trailer was so good that I would have been fully prepared to watch a 2 hour dramatised mockumentary about Theranos. Finding out that this was really Elizabeth Holmes was a huge shock

wait, it was actually her? I thought it was also some uncanny valley magic