Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

A/I shuts down

keepitfree.ai

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

591–600 of 658 posts

Re: A/I shuts down

#591

Post by disgruntledphd2 »

aa-jv wrote: post #585
Waterluvian wrote: post #361

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There clearly is. Because NATO isn’t getting involved in America’s idiotic war of aggression and Trump is very upset about this. They’ve spent years being very upset about every other NATO nation’s spending, too. So even if you don’t believe it, the U.S. clearly cares about NATO member behaviour and therefore recognizes a distinction.

>There clearly is. Because NATO isn’t getting involved in America’s idiotic war of aggression Smoke screen. The USA launches its attacks from the territories of NATO members. NATO has been involved in every war crime the USA has committed this century.

> NATO has been involved in every war crime the USA has committed this century.

NATO countries, yes (mostly the Brits and Polish). NATO as an organization, only for Serbia and Afghanistan.

Re: A/I shuts down

#592

Post by vrganj »

Muromec wrote: post #489
mitxela wrote: post #402

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I believe the pragmatic definition is "disagreement with the government".

Lasting and violent disagreement with the government, usually on ideological grounds, without being a recognised agent of (another?) government. Remove any qualifier and you end up in some other category.

How is hosting a website and an email violent?

Re: A/I shuts down

#593

Post by supriyo-biswas »

mitxela wrote: post #505
sublinear wrote: post #279

Earlier quoted context omitted.

HN only (lazily) filters content. It doesn't engage in ideological vetting, and doesn't need to either. A good amount of the commenters on this story probably would encourage violence, or at least agree with the sentiment on a different platform, yet here they are. I'm not even sure if they're real people or bots. We are having a discussion right now that would not be allowed if there was vetting.

HN's filtering is anything but lazy. Do you have showdead enabled in the settings? If not, enable it and refresh this comments page. A bunch of my comments were mysteriously deadened and I have no idea why - they aren't flagged. This was among them. Maybe it was a retaliation for talking about HN's filtering?

When a post receive a number of flags and downvotes higher than some configured threshold, they're marked as "[dead]".

Re: A/I shuts down

#594

Post by selfhoster1312 »

golem14 wrote: post #564
lrvick wrote: post #446

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> not technically unwinnable Most should take those odds over giving up another inch of freedom.

People with minor kids and/or dependent spouses/family often disagree.

I don't have a scientific study at hand, but historically many revolutionaries and resistance fighters were family men and women with children who precisely cared for their children's future.

Re: A/I shuts down

#595

Post by aa-jv »

disgruntledphd2 wrote: post #591
aa-jv wrote: post #585

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>There clearly is. Because NATO isn’t getting involved in America’s idiotic war of aggression Smoke screen. The USA launches its attacks from the territories of NATO members. NATO has been involved in every war crime the USA has committed this century.

> NATO has been involved in every war crime the USA has committed this century. NATO countries, yes (mostly the Brits and Polish). NATO as an organization, only for Serbia and Afghanistan.

Brits, Polish, Germans, Italians, French, Turkish. NATO bases are used without discretion to launch atrocities.

Re: A/I shuts down

#596

Post by selfhoster1312 »

vrganj wrote: post #592
Muromec wrote: post #489

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Lasting and violent disagreement with the government, usually on ideological grounds, without being a recognised agent of (another?) government. Remove any qualifier and you end up in some other category.

How is hosting a website and an email violent?

Not arguing in favor of banning A/I, but the US administration claims A/I email services were used to coordinate sabotage actions. I mean, that's as stupid as saying telephone networks or paper sheets were used to coordinate sabotage actions.

Furthermore, the noblogs.org platform (previously hosted by A/I) is used to host a lot of politically-motivated content, including news and statements by various resistance groups across the world, which of course is considered terrorist by the USA, but legally should fall under freedom of the press.

Re: A/I shuts down

#597

Post by selfhoster1312 »

stale2002 wrote: post #364
sdenton4 wrote: post #104

Earlier quoted context omitted.

... But also, there's no organization called antifa, and no antifa members. It's an accusation levied against people the right wing wants to call terrorists.

> But also, there's no organization called antifa, and no antifa members Left wing extremist groups absolutely exist. The fact that they don't go around wearing matching uniforms with the letters ANTIFA on them doesn't change that. Your demand for an exact membership list is simply not how extremist organizations work. Terroristic groups have always been fairly amorphous.

That's not true. Black Panther was a group. CNT was a group. Even on the other side of the spectrum, KKK and Boogaloo Boys are groups. They all have a name, membership, and identification.

There's no "antifa" organization because antifascism is a concept with different branches of thoughts and practices. Calling antifa an organization is akin to calling "science" an organization. Sure a dictator can arrest millions of people of the "science" terror organization and jail them for their dangerous subversion, but that doesn't make the "science" organization any more real.

Re: A/I shuts down

#598

Post by port11 »

mag7269 wrote: post #14
InsideOutSanta wrote: post #2

I hereby designate the US government an international terrorist organization.

If that's what you characterize the US government as, I can only imagine what you characterize some of the other governments around the world. Particularly, from the millions of us who migrated to the US legally and willfully and who are very VERY grateful to this country for providing the opportunities people like myself could only dream-of in our former countries.

Many (most?) governments around the world strike no terror on other countries. They don’t go around invading other countries, nor sanctioning them on the basis of belief, nor using their soft/hard power to exert pressure at a global scale.

Don’t get me wrong: I’m grateful for many things the USA has done, and for the inventiveness and generosity of its people; but let’s not pretend like their government(s) have been the kindest or most terror-free in the past decades.

The USA can be both a good and bad thing. And terrorism, by definition, is a bit of what they do abroad.

Re: A/I shuts down

#599

Post by selfhoster1312 »

inferniac wrote: post #437
coldpie wrote: post #85

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The US Republican party has been inventing an increasingly elaborate alternate reality fiction in order to convince their voters to keep voting for policy positions that obviously work against those voters' own interests. One component of this alternate reality is a fictional terrorist organization called "antifa." They claim that anyone who does not align with their policies is a member of this organization. This al…

>voting for policy positions that obviously work against those voters' own interests Delusions of grandeur / superiority complex much? Have you considered a posibility, that these voters just dont agree with your idea of what their best interests are? >fictional terrorist organization called "antifa." An organization so fictional, that just a few months back multiple members were convicted in a terrorist attack https…

> Antifa defenders just hide behind the fact that the movement is decentralized and leaderless by design

Calling a movement an organization is a fiction, unless you live in an alternate reality. Should i consider you part of an organization because you tweeted a certain hashtag once? Are you the member of a band because you whistled a song on the subway? Are you in the military because you watched a Rambo movie when you were a teen?

Re: A/I shuts down

#600

Post by selfhoster1312 »

graemep wrote: post #251
toomuchtodo wrote: post #43

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Which is why efforts by China to stand up independent cross border payment rails are important. You have to cut the US out of any ability to control activities outside of their boundaries. China, Egypt to do away with the use of the US dollar - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49555056 - September 2026 China nears launch of mBridge as alternative to Swift - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48636931 - June 202…

So the rest of the world has the option of relying on China instead? How is that better?

The BRICS organization is precisely setup to not rely on the single actor, China included. They all have strong disagreements, but they all agree having a single global bully (USA) is bad for all involved parties.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BRICS

Post reply on HN