61–70 of 101 posts
There’s kind of an interesting thread here about open source, which is usually thought of as more secure because of more eyes on the code, actually being less secure because an accidental merge can be exploited instantly with LLM’s monitoring. Is there a lot more security value in obscurity than before?
This shortens the exploit window
Why do they say it's white hat hackers?
Purported white-hat hackers. The implication is that these people are presumably describing themselves as such, but it may not actually be true.
Where I live it's only theft if there is an intention to unlawfully take ownership of the good. As an example, forgetting to pay in a supermarket lies exactly on that boundary. Take a cart or hide a product and you won't get away. Try to pay, payment fails and you don't notice, walk away and get apprehended and you might convince the judge that you had no intention to unlawfully take ownership.
One disadvantage of decentralized money, criminals gain more power. Many such cases
I'm not sure if there is actually any evidence of this? Criminals do very well without crypto. If you look at percent of the economy that is fraudulent, it is quite large. If you look at percentage of crypto economy that is fraudulent, it is surprisingly similar
There’s kind of an interesting thread here about open source, which is usually thought of as more secure because of more eyes on the code, actually being less secure because an accidental merge can be exploited instantly with LLM’s monitoring. Is there a lot more security value in obscurity than before?
Maybe there's a middle ground where the code itself is only made visible at the same time as the latest build. This shortens the exploit window
One disadvantage of decentralized money, criminals gain more power. Many such cases
[flagged]
[flagged]
Great, blog spam comments on HN now? Where is the "Cry that no independent regulator audited their systems and that the transactions were not reversible" coming from? Neither the Twitter thread nor the HN comments even mention anything about this, just the typical argument against yourself?
But I see how polarized you are about the topic.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Great, blog spam comments on HN now? Where is the "Cry that no independent regulator audited their systems and that the transactions were not reversible" coming from? Neither the Twitter thread nor the HN comments even mention anything about this, just the typical argument against yourself?
I am just saying that this would not happened with a normal bank. Pure DeFi structural deficiency. But I see how polarized you are about the topic.
Ok, but who were you quoting before? I too see how polarized your view seems to be, given you started this conversation with arguing against yourself for some reason.
Get rid of it.