Live data from Hacker News

It took a year to ship WebAssembly in Anubis

anubis.techaro.lol

11–20 of 209 posts

Re: It took a year to ship WebAssembly in Anubis

#11
post #9

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> at least in crypto there is a token you can sell That would defeat the purpose. The goal is to make scraping costly, not profitable.

I guess it could in principle be profitable for the website, not the client?

unfortunately at that point it would be indistinguishable from running cryptojacking on your website

Re: It took a year to ship WebAssembly in Anubis

#12
post #2

It's wild to me that PoW systems are how we sort the bot problem... the bummer is that all this "work" is just wasted cycles, at least in crypto there is a token you can sell.

> at least in crypto there is a token you can sell That would defeat the purpose. The goal is to make scraping costly, not profitable.

Scraping would be costly in this world: scrapers would have to spend tokens in order to get the webpage.

But, in this world, the website owner would receive tokens that they can then use to do whatever they want, including paying for servers and bandwidth. This is the sense in which the cycles aren’t wasted: the website owner now has cash to spend.

Effectively, both scrapers and ordinary users would be paying for the privilege of getting website bytes.

This also solves the problem of having to wait for your phone to solve the challenge while you’re browsing: you can buy or mine some tokens ahead of time and pay them as soon as challenged. So can the scrapers, but because they’re accessing enormous numbers of pages it’s hopefully prohibitively expensive for them.

Re: It took a year to ship WebAssembly in Anubis

#14

It would be cool if the POW could be done ahead of time. That way I don't get stuck waiting while I'm working. Some type of credit/tokens that my browser could then spend.

I wonder if you could convince the Anubis author to implement x402 payments to bypass the PoW

Re: It took a year to ship WebAssembly in Anubis

#15
post #4

See also: https://github.com/eternal-flame-AD/pow-buster - Browser extension that already used WASM to accelerate the anubis solver, among others. https://github.com/kasper93/anubis_webgpu - Browser extension that uses webgpu, for another order-of-magnitude speedup (depending on your GPU of course).

afaik argon2 should make the GPU less helpful

Re: It took a year to ship WebAssembly in Anubis

#16
> hey Claude vibeslop me a CUDA Anubis solver" route is on its way to being fundamentally dead.

Lmao yeah no. I don't think a little argon2 is going to change shit all.

I mean the thesis of Anubis itself is "scrappers are compute limited (in ways that consumer devices are not)" which has its own massive flaws.

Re: It took a year to ship WebAssembly in Anubis

#17
post #2

It's wild to me that PoW systems are how we sort the bot problem... the bummer is that all this "work" is just wasted cycles, at least in crypto there is a token you can sell.

> at least in crypto there is a token you can sell That would defeat the purpose. The goal is to make scraping costly, not profitable.

Sure, then just replace it with something that is useful to society but not immediately profitable to a scraper, like science research

Re: It took a year to ship WebAssembly in Anubis

#18
post #5

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Perhaps understanding why it exists is a good start, as opposed to flinging childish language around.

[flagged]

People like you are why keeping the anime furry in Anubis is a soft requirement. You can really sort the wheat from the chaff by deliberately pissing off the wrong people.

Re: It took a year to ship WebAssembly in Anubis

#19
post #5

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Perhaps understanding why it exists is a good start, as opposed to flinging childish language around.

[flagged]

Anubis is significantly better than Cloudfare from a ux perspective because it doesn't require interacting with the page. Being gated by turnstiles and having to stop what youre doing while you're waiting is infuriating. To say nothing of Google hard blocking people it doesn't like out of websites and alluding to moving towards ID verification for its captchas.

You sound like a child throwing a tantrum. Before throwing around insults calling people post-teenager, you should maybe look at your own behavior. Is adult behavior getting angry to the point of swearing because you saw a cartoon character?

Re: It took a year to ship WebAssembly in Anubis

#20

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> at least in crypto there is a token you can sell That would defeat the purpose. The goal is to make scraping costly, not profitable.

Sure, then just replace it with something that is useful to society but not immediately profitable to a scraper, like science research

I want to do this eventually, but it's hard to split things into the micro-tasks that would be required to make this work on Anubis. One of the ideas I'm throwing around is a world where Anubis helps fuzz old games to find timesaves in tool-assisted speedruns. It's harder than you think.
Post reply on HN