Live data from Hacker News

Nitter has more working instances than before the takedowns

codeberg.org

271–280 of 394 posts

Re: Nitter has more working instances than before the takedowns

#271
post #258

Publicly suggesting using a shady service to buy masses of accounts instead of just using the damn service. Mental

The shady service is only for people looking to host nitter, and it's not required. My instance uses accounts that I made myself, for free.

Re: Nitter has more working instances than before the takedowns

#272
post #148

A non -technological way to give negative feedback to Twitter/X is to stop using it, even "just reading an occasional post". Continuing to read things on it, even through Nitter, is in the interests of Twitter/X and of the people who continue to support Twitter/X by posting there. Tell the people who use it no. The decent people won't hear them on Twitter/X, and the decent people will wonder what's wrong with them if…

We have to move people to mastodon or bluesky. Stop using x Twitter

Re: Nitter has more working instances than before the takedowns

#273
post #147

There are some extremely sketchy instances with "are you a robot" click dialogs that redirect to exploit URLs. I would search for other options not listed. I'm not going to name them here because X is lazy and reads HN for scheduling takedown notices.

None of the instances listed have anything like that going on. I believe that all listed instances use either https://www.cloudflare.com/products/turnstile/, https://anubis.techaro.lol/, https://git.miningtcup.me/MiningTcup/dogwaf (made by me), or nothing at all. I recommend against using instances not listed unless you know the host because there are reasons for them to not be listed. I won't elaborate on the reasons for some major instances not being on the list as I want to keep my HN account.

Re: Nitter has more working instances than before the takedowns

#274

Will this list automatically update as instances hit rate limits or break for other reasons? Some public instances only have one account to log in with, some have thousands and use residential proxies.

No, not automatically. The list is instances which are reliable, so if an instance is ratelimited any noticeable portion of the time, it won't be up there.

Re: Nitter has more working instances than before the takedowns

#275
post #15

Yeah, but most of these will fall. I used to use one or two of these to scrape my friends' posts because I stopped using Twitter and they'd inevitably all disappear in time. It's like chasing the latest TPB. In the end, I just logged in a headless browser and told an agent to fetch daily.

"They will inevitably all disappear in time."

Years ago HN commenters were making the same comment when most Nitter instances were abandoned

Meanwhile nitter.poast.org kept working for years

Then xcancel.com appeared

When there is no longer a method for an internet subscriber to read Twitter/X without the subscriber creating an account on Twitter/X (and "logging in"), then the subscriber can use a headless browser

But that time has not yet come, and no HN commenter has succeeded in predicting when exactly that time will come

The disappearance of "ad blockers" as browser extensions/add-ons may be "inevitable"

Unlike Nitter, we don't see HN commenters trying to downplay their usefulness

Free internet "services" disappear all the time, for a variety of reasons

For example,

https://killedbygoogle.com/

Re: Nitter has more working instances than before the takedowns

#276

This is a silly fact that doesn't matter, because nobody knows where they are anymore. Even worse, this goofy gloating post ensures that these are about to taken down, too. Nitter can literally be run for a single user, so if a hundred people set it up for their own personal use, I guess that's also more working instances than before the takedown. A real victory if you're dumb. So for everyone who managed to find ano…

All the instances on the list agreed to be put on it. Their maintainers decided that they were willing to be on it because it's unlikely that they will get a C&D.

Re: Nitter has more working instances than before the takedowns

#277

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Many people regard Elon as a hero or villain. I regard him as a tragedy: A great entrepreneur who wrecked his sanity due to drugs, genetics, and/or overwork.

Great entrepreneur is a bit of a far fetch. His own friends(?) didn't want him to be CEO of paypal back in the day.

He's just serving the profitable market niche of incompetent CEOs with golden parachutes

Re: Nitter has more working instances than before the takedowns

#278

Thats the nice thing about alternate frontends like Nitter, if the main instance goes down you can just clone the repo and make your own very easily, or choose from one of the many alternate instances out there. I highly recommend the extension libredirect, which will redirect you to instances of your choice (or just stick with the defaults). It doesn't just work for Twitter/X, but also Reddit, Tiktok, Youtube, and m…

> you can just clone the repo and make your own very easily This is not the case for Nitter. It requires real X accounts to run, quite possibly hundreds or thousands for a major public instance. Creating X accounts currently requires phone number verification.

[deleted]

Re: Nitter has more working instances than before the takedowns

#279
post #266

Earlier quoted context omitted.

With power comes responsibility, and I think responsibility has fallen out of fashion. I think this comes down to the definition of "want", and I talk to my kids about this because I wish we had a different word. Yes, I want to have the piece of cake tonight, but I would also want to not have diabetes in 20 years. People want instant access to the entirety of music produced by humanity for a flat fee, but they also w…

In fairness once you've seen a movie its value drops with most never getting a second viewing. Them having the ability to take back that awful movie doesn't hurt as much as a song.

You do not, under any circumstances, "gotta hand it to them"

Re: Nitter has more working instances than before the takedowns

#280

Thats the nice thing about alternate frontends like Nitter, if the main instance goes down you can just clone the repo and make your own very easily, or choose from one of the many alternate instances out there. I highly recommend the extension libredirect, which will redirect you to instances of your choice (or just stick with the defaults). It doesn't just work for Twitter/X, but also Reddit, Tiktok, Youtube, and m…

> you can just clone the repo and make your own very easily This is not the case for Nitter. It requires real X accounts to run, quite possibly hundreds or thousands for a major public instance. Creating X accounts currently requires phone number verification.

It is possible to create X accounts without a phone number. I run [service].miningtcup.me and it uses 5 accounts, none of which required phone numbers for me to create, and none of which I paid for. You just have to get creative.
Post reply on HN