Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Corporate America is getting hooked on open-source AI

nytimes.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

301–306 of 306 posts

Re: Corporate America is getting hooked on open-source AI

#301

Post by autoexec »

robrorcroptrer wrote: post #279
autoexec wrote: post #249

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I have never heard of a cloud service of ISP actively taking corporate data and shoving it into other users inbox. You'd never hear about if it the cloud service was taking your corporate data and using it for countless other things though. Insider trading, selling leads to your competitors, pushing ads to your clients/customers with offers of their own products, using trends in what your company and others are doi…

The burden of proof is on you. I doubt they want to risk their reputation, trust and agreements to make money in the ways you describe.

Corporations are amoral psychopaths that don't care about anything except getting more money and power. We have countless examples of them lying, violating the law, and even murdering large numbers of people (including babies) to get it. What makes you think a corporation would ever choose their "reputation, trust and agreements" over money and power?

Re: Corporate America is getting hooked on open-source AI

#302

Post by iainctduncan »

MrDresden wrote: post #218
iainctduncan wrote: post #55

The thing is, for big companies (or even small ones owned by PE, which is MOST of them), it's not just about cost. The big thing is risk . In my experience as a tech diligence assessor for PE firms for the last 7 years, investors really, really don't like companies being beholded to single entities that they don't control. Anthropic and OpenAI have demonstrated that they are not trustworthy, or predicatable, or finan…

How does this compare to being beholden to a single cloud providers like AWS or Google Cloud? Has there been a sea change in how investors view these things in general, or is it only AI?

Our clients do indeed see multi-cloud as a nice-to-have, but it costs so much more to do, and the big clouds are so trusted, that it's rare that I see it.

On the other hand, nobody trusts the big AI companies not to pull shenanigans or dramatically raise prices... or even be in business in five years.

Re: Corporate America is getting hooked on open-source AI

#303

Post by nozzlegear »

therealdrag0 wrote: post #251
chasd00 wrote: post #215

Earlier quoted context omitted.

it holds all the water, to this very day using open source in my client's projects requires approval from legal.

And does legal ever give approval?

I fear we may never know the answer.

Re: Corporate America is getting hooked on open-source AI

#304

Post by jjfoooo4 »

dboreham wrote: post #172
chasd00 wrote: post #29

I'm not seeing it. Corporate America needs someone they can sue if anything goes sideways with AI given the rate of change and legal ambiguities. It took years/decades for actual, real, open source to be widely adopted in corporations for the same reasons.

Not seeing it either. I do see a torrent of astroturf saying everyone is using self hosted LLMs, but in reality nobody I know is.

What monied interest is trying to gin up enthusiasm for open source models?

Re: Corporate America is getting hooked on open-source AI

#305

Post by spopejoy »

syntaxing wrote: post #22

I swear, Qwen 3.8 27B @ Q8 is smarter than Sonnet 5 most of the time. Why wouldn’t corporate America self host at this point, especially with better options like Deepseek Flash and GLM 5.3 flash that’s a middle ground between Sonnet and Opus

I mean, why self-host? Deepseek v4 flash is dirt-cheap on openrouter. Inference is a race to the bottom at this point.

Re: Corporate America is getting hooked on open-source AI

#306

Post by spopejoy »

slowin wrote: post #3

I'd love to! For real coding though, SOTA models barely get the job done. It wasn't until Opus 4.5 that you could really get decent results. I'm sure this will change (and I can't wait for it!) but as of today, open models might be fine for summarizing and writing docs, but you need SOTA to work on code if you want to be competitive.

I'm having no difficulty getting deepseek v4 to blast out good code. I guess devs want to outsource all of their thinking now? Yes open models maybe can't design the whole thing soup to nuts but why is that necessary?
Post reply on HN