I might cut into my own flesh right now, but the funny thing about that XCancel shutdown is that while the website is down, the RSS feeds still work. Almost like they've just been required to shutdown the visible website and they complied with exactly that.
Nitter has more working instances than before the takedowns
151–160 of 417 posts
Re: Nitter has more working instances than before the takedowns
#152Earlier quoted context omitted.
To be fair, it's possible that he changed, rather than that everyone who now hates him did.
Many people regard Elon as a hero or villain. I regard him as a tragedy: A great entrepreneur who wrecked his sanity due to drugs, genetics, and/or overwork.
Then again, I often think that about myself. But I'm not a trillionaire.
It does sound like losing his first child at 10 weeks really messed him up. It definitely would do that to anybody.
Re: Nitter has more working instances than before the takedowns
#153Earlier quoted context omitted.
Sadly, the music selection has fallen off a cliff, and the rest is in a sharply downward spiral... in one sense this is because the music industry finally settled on a streaming model that most people are willing to rent, and it's also because the new generation has been brainwashed or trained out of storing their own files.
> the new generation has been brainwashed or trained out of storing their own files. It has very little to do with this and more just about the ubiquitous availability of 5G and always-available streaming. I stopped caring about data hoarding once I could just access anything I wanted reliably wherever I was.
Fortunately, sending a screenshot to Claude tells me what to push in a minute or so, but, unfortunately, I can’t just hand it an API endpoint and have it scrub all this crap weekly.
(No idea why the streaming service can’t just do that themselves, of course…)
Of course, for movies, it’s gotten to the point where I just drive to the used DVD store. $1-5 per movie used (including blurays); $20-30 new. I usually walk out with a dozen or so films for $100. This is easier than tpb.
Re: Nitter has more working instances than before the takedowns
#154Earlier quoted context omitted.
> It's like chasing the latest TPB. What do you mean? TPB been online and at the exact same URL (give or take some days/weeks around raids) for like two decades, and still has the same URL today. Might not be the same group, but not sure what "chasing" you're referring to?
It's distributing malware, do not use any of the "TPB" sites.
Living without the good just to avoid that is maybe one philosophy of life, but certainly not the only valid one.
Re: Nitter has more working instances than before the takedowns
#155Earlier quoted context omitted.
All of the WWW was better in 2008. Unironically. We've all been frog-boiled into this current hellscape.
There was a brief moment when smartphones first came out but the rest of the world's companies weren't taking them seriously yet that was a truly brilliant time and ever since then it's been nothing but downhill.
Re: Nitter has more working instances than before the takedowns
#156Re: Nitter has more working instances than before the takedowns
#157Earlier quoted context omitted.
Use Redlib [1] or one of the other alternative Reddit frontends. [1] https://github.com/redlib-org/redlib
At that point though, it's like why. Reddit is, well, trash. It's barely worth visiting without an account, and if you're going to make me jump through hoops to visit, it's time to accept the message of "we don't want you here" and go somewhere else.
Re: Nitter has more working instances than before the takedowns
#158Please link to primary sources. If I need an alternative method of accessing the site, I'll figure it out.
Re: Nitter has more working instances than before the takedowns
#159Hot take: All those instances keep the service relevant giving it more reach than necessary. Just shut it down. Cancel Twitter and jump on the BlueSkye or Mastodon train.
Nah, I like my freedom of speech, thanks.
Re: Nitter has more working instances than before the takedowns
#160Earlier quoted context omitted.
The vote count is just the normal vote count, so I guess only the ordering is different?
It is, isn't it .. serves me right for breezing through that too quickly. If there's something magical going on, the ordering would be the only real distinction possible. Apparently the original (still the same?) dates back to the OG PG days: Ask HN: who knows about this - " http://News.YCombinator.com/classic"? - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1832884 It's what the frontpage would look like if only the votes o…