We found deSEC to be the only affordable DNS supplier in the EU that complies with state of the art secure DNSSEC. Highly recommended.
> We found deSEC to be the only affordable DNS supplier in the EU that complies with state of the art secure DNSSEC. I mean, if your definition of "affordable" is free, then sure. But for the record there are other affordable EU suppliers who do DNSSEC: - Bunny DNS[0] is "free" – i.e. only subject to their minimum $1/month account spend fee. - RcodeZero is very affordable[1] plus added bonus it is run by the `.at` re…
deSEC – Free Secure DNS
21–30 of 59 posts
Re: deSEC – Free Secure DNS
#22We found deSEC to be the only affordable DNS supplier in the EU that complies with state of the art secure DNSSEC. Highly recommended.
> We found deSEC to be the only affordable DNS supplier in the EU that complies with state of the art secure DNSSEC. I mean, if your definition of "affordable" is free, then sure. But for the record there are other affordable EU suppliers who do DNSSEC: - Bunny DNS[0] is "free" – i.e. only subject to their minimum $1/month account spend fee. - RcodeZero is very affordable[1] plus added bonus it is run by the `.at` re…
Re: deSEC – Free Secure DNS
#23Re: deSEC – Free Secure DNS
#24Re: deSEC – Free Secure DNS
#25I signed up and saw they only allowed a single subdomain for DDNS, with docs saying to contact support if you needed more. I emailed asking for just 1 more subdomain and support told me that for my usecase I should just use CloudFlare. So I did. No silly miniscule restrictions.
Similar story: asked for an increase and got told > […] our mission is to improve Internet security by increasing the adoption of DNSSEC. [We therefore expect users to enable DNSSEC for their domains. > Would you be willing to do that? Wanting to increase the adoption of DNSSEC is fair, but couldn’t this be all self-serve? It’s almost as if they don’t want people to use them.
Re: deSEC – Free Secure DNS
#26Just use unbound
Re: deSEC – Free Secure DNS
#27Earlier quoted context omitted.
Similar story: asked for an increase and got told > […] our mission is to improve Internet security by increasing the adoption of DNSSEC. [We therefore expect users to enable DNSSEC for their domains. > Would you be willing to do that? Wanting to increase the adoption of DNSSEC is fair, but couldn’t this be all self-serve? It’s almost as if they don’t want people to use them.
They've actually just done that, your limit automatically gets increased if all your domains are secured.
Re: deSEC – Free Secure DNS
#28Re: deSEC – Free Secure DNS
#29Re: deSEC – Free Secure DNS
#30We found deSEC to be the only affordable DNS supplier in the EU that complies with state of the art secure DNSSEC. Highly recommended.
DNSSEC support is an anti-feature, it is dead/dying and the faster we can unburden ourselves from it the faster we can move on to better solutions. https://sockpuppet.org/blog/2015/01/15/against-dnssec/