Formalizing Fermat's Last Theorem
1–10 of 526 posts
Re: Formalizing Fermat's Last Theorem
#2Re: Formalizing Fermat's Last Theorem
#3Provides great context on this accomplishment, what it means but also doesn't mean.
Re: Formalizing Fermat's Last Theorem
#4Re: Formalizing Fermat's Last Theorem
#5Re: Formalizing Fermat's Last Theorem
#6I've tried the various intros to Lean multiple times (even before Lean 4 came out) and something about the way Lean proofs are written does not align with how I think about proofs. My very brief attempts at Isabelle / RCoq feel more natural.
I think it's a pity that the future of proofs is Lean. I'd love for someone to come up with a more digestable proof language!
Re: Formalizing Fermat's Last Theorem
#7Pretty insane. I suppose it lends further credence to the idea that anything that can be shown to be correct can be done by a model.
Re: Formalizing Fermat's Last Theorem
#8Re: Formalizing Fermat's Last Theorem
#9I optimistically expect to witness the advent of a global 'panacea' in my lifetime thanks to AI's efforts. Cost effective large scale genetic engineering, a cure for every disease, potentially even a cure for aging.
The future is both beautiful and terrifying.
Re: Formalizing Fermat's Last Theorem
#10 status: "self-assessed"
13 million lines of Lean, where the Lean and Nanoda kernels missed the Collatz hack.Fable, please translate to HOL-light. Make no mistakes. You are doing great!