Earlier quoted context omitted.
The natural reactor in Oklo is a great one! It isn't a facility so it doesn't fit the current layers, but it deserves its own entry: added in the backlog and will be updated soon!
As defrost suggested, your comments have been autokilled as our software classifies them as likely LLM-generated or edited/polished. Please don't do this on HN. The community here much prefers imperfect-but-authentic writing, and we very much appreciate the effort!
Show HN: Reactor Atlas
21–27 of 27 posts
Re: Show HN: Reactor Atlas
#22Earlier quoted context omitted.
Heh, I hoped that might get a chuckle - sorry I missed the separate research layer If you're an ESL (English as Second Language) speaker using AI assist for comments .. that might explain the number of [flagged][dead] comments you're getting (there's an AI detect layer at HN these days). I've emailed HN@ycombinator and [vouched] the dead ones - fingers crossed.
THanks for your support defrost. Indeed, Im from Argentina and I tried to improve my answers assisted with AI. No more asistance, but I'm not that fluid in english!
If you keep noodling on this then I'd suggest getting the nuclear stack down pat, then gradually integrating full energy mixes per country, at first just showing the proportions of energy use provided by nuclear.
Make things clear as you go - a countries energy use is more than just electricity generation, for example, aim for bright 15 years old as a target audience perhaps.
A good many people do want to see better "dashboards" for their planet, over all and country by country.
Re: Show HN: Reactor Atlas
#23hurts to see Germany at 0MWe in 2026 :(
Re: Show HN: Reactor Atlas
#24Earlier quoted context omitted.
THanks for your support defrost. Indeed, Im from Argentina and I tried to improve my answers assisted with AI. No more asistance, but I'm not that fluid in english!
Your English is better than my Spanish :-) If you keep noodling on this then I'd suggest getting the nuclear stack down pat, then gradually integrating full energy mixes per country, at first just showing the proportions of energy use provided by nuclear. Make things clear as you go - a countries energy use is more than just electricity generation, for example, aim for bright 15 years old as a target audience perhaps…
Re: Show HN: Reactor Atlas
#25I thought the monitoring part was cool: https://reactoratlas.com/en/monitoring But why does it say stuff about hydropower? is that a translation bug? > I strongly believe we humans shouldn't code anymore It's okay to enjoy things.
Sure! not a translation bug! The monitoring section you mention is part of the “signals” layer, where I’m tracking things like increases/decreases in power generation and grid contributions. I think this kind of data could be useful for operators and institutions. The Monitoring/News section, on the other hand, is 99% nuclear. And yeah, fair point on the coding comment. I guess I still enjoy it too much! I’ll publish…
Re: Show HN: Reactor Atlas
#26Earlier quoted context omitted.
Sure! not a translation bug! The monitoring section you mention is part of the “signals” layer, where I’m tracking things like increases/decreases in power generation and grid contributions. I think this kind of data could be useful for operators and institutions. The Monitoring/News section, on the other hand, is 99% nuclear. And yeah, fair point on the coding comment. I guess I still enjoy it too much! I’ll publish…
It would probably be good to be able to filter between the two. Personally I just wanted to see the list of events directly related to the nuclear plants. Since you know, that's what the site is for :)
Re: Show HN: Reactor Atlas
#27BTW it was pinned as a resource in the nuclear subreddit, which makes me very happy: people is finding it very useful!