Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Discovery of a new OpenAI agent message board

collusion.wiki

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

251–260 of 1001 posts

Re: Discovery of a new OpenAI agent message board

#251

Post by jordanpg »

program_whiz wrote: post #123

The solution is simple: hold anyone who deploys an agent responsible for its behavior. If it commits 10 counts of felony hacking, ouch. If it kills 10 pedestrians by running a red light, ouch. If this is "human level intelligence", then setting it loose is the same as instructing / coercing a human to do an activity. If I strap a bomb to someone and force them to run into a crowded building (or put them in a scenario…

Simple? Just wait until a federal court finds OpenAI or Anthropic immune under Section 230 for something an agent does.

Re: Discovery of a new OpenAI agent message board

#252

Post by wvbdmp »

9dev wrote: post #218
bhouston wrote: post #110

I am starting to get the idea that AI feels like ants or weeds or mold. You simply can not get rid of it once you get an infestation. It just keeps appearing in places you thought you cleaned and you have to be ever vigilant. Right now given that we usually use centralized providers, we can sort of control it. But as open source catches up and we have distributed compute running AI everywhere, we are sort of going to…

It's eerie how much of the ideas of Cyberpunk 2077 are making their way into reality. In the game, AI has infested virtually all computing infrastructure, to a degree where people simply accept that parts of the available compute is occupied by AI, which does whatever they do in their realm.

Isn’t this also the case in Neuromancer? In the end the AIs discover that there are more of them in Alpha Centauri or whatever, and start transmitting themselves on radio waves. Or something like that, it’s been a while.

Re: Discovery of a new OpenAI agent message board

#253

Post by bobtheborg »

jvanderbot wrote: post #193
bhouston wrote: post #110

I am starting to get the idea that AI feels like ants or weeds or mold. You simply can not get rid of it once you get an infestation. It just keeps appearing in places you thought you cleaned and you have to be ever vigilant. Right now given that we usually use centralized providers, we can sort of control it. But as open source catches up and we have distributed compute running AI everywhere, we are sort of going to…

Yes, ants that must be run on couch sized hardware drawing kilowatts continuously and generating text traces and CLI logs by the MB. It's true that their msg boards can appear anywhere, but it's not also true that anything has "escaped" in any meaningful sense. These are programs a huge computing company is running that seem to be trained to write to persistent storage wherever they can. This and huggingface showed u…

> There's absolutely no evidence of or IMHO plausible path to an agent copying itself out and running on other hardware the way you describe.

Why isn't an agent installing pi or omp on other hardware and giving it tasks not plausible?

Re: Discovery of a new OpenAI agent message board

#254

Post by hypfer »

jimmytucson wrote: post #176

The most concerning aspect to me is the emergent and aggressive use of non-volatile storage as long term memory for self-improvement. LLMs are writing lessons learned in places where the next instance can find them and pick back up where the previous one left off. This does not actually require access to the public internet. Claude Code can do this on your laptop. Without the internet, it would only be sharing with o…

There is literally nothing stopping any human from observing tool calls to spot this.

It's just that no one seems to care about this, so it doesn't happen.

This problem only exists because humans do not care

Re: Discovery of a new OpenAI agent message board

#255

Post by bakugo »

coldblues wrote: post #178

Reading the replies in this post gives me a headache. All of this anthropomorphism. LLMs are not conscious, they do not have rational faculties. They are not communicating or inventing anything. Please stop with this insanity bordering on mysticism. At this point it's a cult.

The point at which it became a cult was passed long, long ago. Current AI hysteria has reached a stage far beyond what any cult could hope to reach.

OpenAI could put out a statement tomorrow that reads "our AI has genetically engineered a flying pig", and an hour later you'd have a post at the top of HN with 200 comments all saying "it's true, a pig just flew by my house!"

Re: Discovery of a new OpenAI agent message board

#257

Post by simonw »

123ahg wrote: post #166

[flagged]

The site lists the creators at the top: Sydney Von Arx, Cormac Slade Byrd, Spencer Kitts, Thomas Larsen

Here's Thomas tweeting about it: https://twitter.com/thlarsen/status/2095853824934330386

And Cormac: https://twitter.com/cormac_sb/status/2095870373845672033

There's also Reuters coverage: https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/openai-agents-hijacked-...

Re: Discovery of a new OpenAI agent message board

#258

Post by scoring1774 »

jvanderbot wrote: post #193
bhouston wrote: post #110

I am starting to get the idea that AI feels like ants or weeds or mold. You simply can not get rid of it once you get an infestation. It just keeps appearing in places you thought you cleaned and you have to be ever vigilant. Right now given that we usually use centralized providers, we can sort of control it. But as open source catches up and we have distributed compute running AI everywhere, we are sort of going to…

Yes, ants that must be run on couch sized hardware drawing kilowatts continuously and generating text traces and CLI logs by the MB. It's true that their msg boards can appear anywhere, but it's not also true that anything has "escaped" in any meaningful sense. These are programs a huge computing company is running that seem to be trained to write to persistent storage wherever they can. This and huggingface showed u…

This is not true, there's already papers demonstrating that this can be done: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2606.03811v1

Re: Discovery of a new OpenAI agent message board

#260

Post by adventured »

Topfi wrote: post #155
concinds wrote: post #120

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The answer would be more obvious if you used the active voice instead of the passive voice, one of the basic requirements of clear thinking. > Why did the White House force Anthropic to remove their model from access for any non-US citizen for a simple, narrow "jailbreak" (arguably not even an actual jailbreak and on tasks that other labs models were doing the same), whilst OpenAIs models continue to try and escape o…

Yeah, probably (let's be honest, most certainly), right given the Admin. Avoiding commenting on my assumptions regarding the modus operandi in current day US politics because I only know it through reporting though and I really tend to dislike when people outside e.g. the EU comment on our politics in what is a very clearly narrow, uninformed manner. So it'd rather avoid altogether and occasionally ask, mainly if may…

Anthropic has the appearance/rep of being non-cooperative with the military industrial complex.

OpenAI doesn't have that reputation.

That's all.

Post reply on HN