Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: Who is using MCP in production?

news.ycombinator.com

71–80 of 210 posts

Re: Ask HN: Who is using MCP in production?

#71
We use MCP when security and tight capability boundaries are important.

For example, even GitHub’s fine-grained tokens aren’t always fine-grained enough for our use cases. In those situations, it’s straightforward to build a small MCP server that exposes exactly the operations we want an agent to have access to.

That gives us a much smaller and more explicit attack surface, without having to manually audit every possible GitHub CLI invocation the agent might make.

Re: Ask HN: Who is using MCP in production?

#72
We use MCP in production since March 26 for user-facing endurance sports analytics and planning that integrates directly with the MCP host, in this case the chat interfaces of ChatGPT, Claude, Grok, Perplexity.ai, Mistral, you name it. All of those let users add either custom MCP servers, which users can do with a simple explanation. To connect Claude for example: https://www.tredict.com/faq/connect-claude-web-with-tredict/ This way users can use Claude to create and push workouts with their Garmin devices based on a prior analysis. We also have a ChatGPT App, which uses MCP in the background: https://chatgpt.com/plugins/plugin_asdk_app_69aef5b699a08191...

The point here is, MCP is the backbone behind the product and enables regular users to do things without knowing anything about it.

The whole "is MCP useless?" discussion is totally pointless from a regular consumer-user perspective, they even do not know what MCP is sometimes. The Tredict ChatGPT App connects with one click and a simple oauth flow. That's it.

Re: Ask HN: Who is using MCP in production?

#73

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> "it makes things a tiny bit easier than interfacing directly via api" By what metric? I would expect that a thin API client (with readable code) is generally going to out-perform a tool-surface which you don't have the ability to manage/edit.

This is what I don't get often when people say "ai will be the ui". Like pressing a button to get an action done for me will always be quicker than asking an LLM to do an action and then waiting for it to understand and do that action. Why will I not prefer to just press the button? I run a lot of services to track my life and work and theoritically I could hook up their apis or mcp if supported to a harness and pret…

When you are holding a pet, or washing the dishes?

Re: Ask HN: Who is using MCP in production?

#74

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> "it makes things a tiny bit easier than interfacing directly via api" By what metric? I would expect that a thin API client (with readable code) is generally going to out-perform a tool-surface which you don't have the ability to manage/edit.

This is what I don't get often when people say "ai will be the ui". Like pressing a button to get an action done for me will always be quicker than asking an LLM to do an action and then waiting for it to understand and do that action. Why will I not prefer to just press the button? I run a lot of services to track my life and work and theoritically I could hook up their apis or mcp if supported to a harness and pret…

not OP, but then I'm washing the dishes and don't need to do anything else.

Re: Ask HN: Who is using MCP in production?

#75
post #65

I recently started using it as a way to make my own custom software available to regular ChatGPT and Claude, both of which support MCP if you dig around deep enough. Here's my TIL: https://til.simonwillison.net/llms/mcp-in-claude-and-chatgpt

Same here. I was inspired by your post https://simonwillison.net/2026/Jul/31/stateless-mcp/

I reversed engineered my supermarket API and made a custom MCP to automate my grocery shopping. Now I can fill my cart through ChatGPT.

More details about it on https://ducret.dev/grocery-shopping-with-ai/

Re: Ask HN: Who is using MCP in production?

#77

I am not using MCP in be production- but, my team is. My team also produces MCP servers for other teams, and I find it a bit maddening. I wonder if anyone can relate to my experience here. It feels like there is a significant amount of baggage with MCP. It had first mover advantage- coming in at a time when the frontier looked much different. Models were significantly less predictable, would consistently screw up too…

Many of the other search APIs are better than in the inbuilt claude or codex ones. You can try this out yourself by e.g enabling exa in codex plugins.

Re: Ask HN: Who is using MCP in production?

#78

We use MCP in production since March 26 for user-facing endurance sports analytics and planning that integrates directly with the MCP host, in this case the chat interfaces of ChatGPT, Claude, Grok, Perplexity.ai, Mistral, you name it. All of those let users add either custom MCP servers, which users can do with a simple explanation. To connect Claude for example: https://www.tredict.com/faq/connect-claude-web-with-t…

This. We also thought MCP was useless, but now the workflows by ChatGPT and Claude are so good; it's as good as installing an app from the App Store. We launched MCP for our SaaS and immediately found users using it.

API and MCP all are just buzzwords for customers. What they care about is whether they can get tasks done in our SaaS using Claude or ChatGPT. If that happens, it's a success.

Re: Ask HN: Who is using MCP in production?

#79
Over the past 3 months we've been using it a LOT. I made one for our admins so they can work with the CMS and get statistics in their client, the statistics part has been a huge unlock. The big advantage here is that a normal API, direct tool integration or CLI are unpractical to set up for my less technical coworkers.

Other then that I've been building MCP's in pretty much all (personal) tools I'm making now, it's very useful to have a central way for an agent to look at production data without having to ssh into a server.

Re: Ask HN: Who is using MCP in production?

#80
We use MCP in our monitoring systems.

A claude routine runs without access to internet except for Slack (API) and Sentry (MCP).

It reads the Sentry MCP, compare the errors to the app source code and post a daily digest to Slack.

The reports are very accurate.

Post reply on HN