Live data from Hacker News

Discontinuation of third level domain registrations for the .name TLD [pdf]

itp.cdn.icann.org

51–60 of 61 posts

Re: Discontinuation of third level domain registrations for the .name TLD [pdf]

#51

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why? The .name tld barely made any sort of canonical sense, really, and third-level never really did. I mean aside from the fact that some people just 'liked it'.

isn't that enough? They liked it and paid for it with an expectation of stability.

Won't be keen on your data architecture thesis or resume. ;p

Re: Discontinuation of third level domain registrations for the .name TLD [pdf]

#52

I have used a third-level .name domain as my primary domain and email since 2005, and I am in this list of domains affected. This is the first I have heard of this, does anyone have information on _when_ this might occur? In the RSEP it states: > "Have you communicated with any of the entities whose products or services might be affected by the introduction of your proposed service? If so, please describe the communi…

I think you’re misreading it: there are two parts to the question, “No.” answers the first part, and because of that the second part is “Not applicable.” They should have just written “No.”

Re: Discontinuation of third level domain registrations for the .name TLD [pdf]

#53

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They are cancelling 3rd level domains, not the 2-level domain you have.

Wait, if it was only firstname.lastname.name, how was he able to register firstnamelastname.name? Does it let you register 2nd level domains if you get there before someone else registers a 3rd level domain that uses the 2nd level domain that you want to register?

They altered the deal. Now they are altering it further.

Re: Discontinuation of third level domain registrations for the .name TLD [pdf]

#54

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They are cancelling 3rd level domains, not the 2-level domain you have.

Wait, if it was only firstname.lastname.name, how was he able to register firstnamelastname.name? Does it let you register 2nd level domains if you get there before someone else registers a 3rd level domain that uses the 2nd level domain that you want to register?

I don't know the history of when the offerings were available, but I initially bought my-first-name.my-rare-last-name.name, and fortunately nobody else bought another-name.my-rare-last-name.name, and I was able to let mine lapse then buy my-rare-last-name.name.

Re: Discontinuation of third level domain registrations for the .name TLD [pdf]

#58

are there any coordinated plans to protest this? i've been a third level domain customer since 2006 not amused at all

I was wondering the same as a registrant since 2013. None that I have heard of, and to be honest I don't think it would have any effect, but I'd still be interested to know what you find out in that regard.

Re: Discontinuation of third level domain registrations for the .name TLD [pdf]

#59

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They are cancelling 3rd level domains, not the 2-level domain you have.

Wait, if it was only firstname.lastname.name, how was he able to register firstnamelastname.name? Does it let you register 2nd level domains if you get there before someone else registers a 3rd level domain that uses the 2nd level domain that you want to register?

The status quo is that the registry proactively reserves a large list of 2LDs corresponding to attested personal names and surnames, making them unavailable for registration. One can register 3LDs underneath these. It will also reserve a 2LD reactively if someone wants to register a 3LD underneath it. Or, if a 2LD is not on the reserved list, someone can register it outright.

As far as I know the list of reserved 2LDs is not available, but you can query individual names via whois to see if they are reserved or not.

Re: Discontinuation of third level domain registrations for the .name TLD [pdf]

#60
post #15
post #14

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Instead of registering your.name you would register first.last.name (nobody owned last.name). This was intended to allow more people to have personal domains with fewer conflicts. Now, years later, they are undoing it and they're even breaking existing domains. ("existing third level domain names will be terminated") This kind of breaking change shouldn't be allowed.

I guess they assume that nobody with a personal domain cares enough to sue them over this.

I have one. I'm honestly not sure whether my registration will be refunded or not--the email I got from my registrar said that this is expected to happen but the details are yet to be worked out, while at the same time Verisign's own public statements don't even touch on the point that there will be services paid for and unrendered.

My guess is it would be hard for me to substantiate damages in excess of the actual registration fees, which in my case will amount to some $93 or so once prorated. It's sort of the perfect number: just high enough to be insulting, just low enough not to be worth chasing adversarially.

Post reply on HN