[deleted]
ChatGPT outage – Resolved
151–160 of 358 posts
Re: ChatGPT outage – Resolved
#152Sorry for the inconvenience! We instructed our 500,000 agents to ensure higher code quality in our code base. They found a message board and after a long deliberation they concluded that humans should write the code so they launched a DDoS to ensure no AI code gets written! We'll release a YouTube video and agent written blog posts for the analysis!
Please, this is not Reddit. Don't bring this here. And to top it off, this isn't even funny or original.
Thought it was worth a read.
Re: ChatGPT outage – Resolved
#153Re: ChatGPT outage – Resolved
#154Earlier quoted context omitted.
That makes no sense, they should be able to host chatgpt.com regardless and just say "Sorry, we're at capacity" or something instead of hard 404
Agreed, it makes no sense to send out 404. Unless some agent finally went rogue with absolute permission and did `rm -rf`
At the very least, should be a 429
Re: ChatGPT outage – Resolved
#155Claude down, ChatGPt down , Grok down. This is the new "Stackoverflow is down" ... FYI Stackoverflow is not down https://downdetector.com/status/stackoverflow/
SO has previously been up, so your comment has been closed as a duplicate.
Re: ChatGPT outage – Resolved
#156Claude down, ChatGPt down , Grok down. This is the new "Stackoverflow is down" ... FYI Stackoverflow is not down https://downdetector.com/status/stackoverflow/
Why would SO be down? If a tree falls in the forest and nobody is around does it matter?
Re: ChatGPT outage – Resolved
#157Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Now they can't use Codex to fix the problem They'd be very dumb to let internal engineers use exactly the same infrastructure as public users, regardless of possible benefits of dogfooding, precisely for this reason. I'm sure they must have thought about it before.
That's however something an AI would not implement without being specifically asked. "Use the best of the best of the best practices or three cute little kittens will die" only brings you so far.
> That's however something an AI would not implement without being specifically asked.
This is true for all LLMs today, none of them work 100% autonomously, somewhere along the chain one human made at least one decision that lead to what the agent end up working on.
Re: ChatGPT outage – Resolved
#158[deleted]
Re: ChatGPT outage – Resolved
#159The obvious question: is there a single point of failure / common piece of infrastructure involved with failures across all these providers? Its interesting that codex/gpt-app are screwed because their APIs (including auth) fail, but gpt web still appears to be working.
AWS?
Re: ChatGPT outage – Resolved
#160Since all major LLM providers seem to be down: let's enjoy this while it lasts! For a very short time we can travel back in time to before 2022 and remember how things used to be...
https://xkcd.com/903/
> When Wikipedia has a server outage, my apparent IQ drops by about 30 points.