Claude outage – Resolved
status.claude.com
Claude outage – Resolved
1–10 of 167 posts
Re: Claude outage – Resolved
#2Damn, I'll have to think for myself now...
Re: Claude outage – Resolved
#3Kind of cool how fable 5.1 just worked around these by reassigning subagents to non-failing models with more supervision and now with a hint to Sol and Flash 3.8.
Re: Claude outage – Resolved
#4What's funny is I had just told Claude to kill whatever coding loop it had running. Then got a 529 immediately.
Re: Claude outage – Resolved
#5Officially signing up for the $200 Codex plan now. I do like CC, but these errors are happening every week now, and if they (Anthropic) gave regular resets that's one thing, but somehow I'm already at 62% weekly usage after the random reset this Tuesday using Fable 5.1 medium. Just not worth it any longer compared to Codex IMO. I already set up my skills and everything to be generic and not CC specific, so it shouldn't be too hard to transition over. I'll run both for a month and decide.
Re: Claude outage – Resolved
#6It would be really funny if Anthropic engs run open weight models locally when they need to fix Claude API issues :)
Re: Claude outage – Resolved
#7This pushed me off of a cheaper model into a more expensive one :'(
Re: Claude outage – Resolved
#8It goes down so often that I've advocated my company create enterprise Codex accounts as backup for devs.
Re: Claude outage – Resolved
#9Setting aside annoyance at the downtime, I'm really curious about the reasons for the failures, because I have to imagine there are some novel failure modes when serving these giant models that I haven't experienced with the kind of work I've done.
Anyone out there working in this space who can elucidate us on interesting failure scenarios unique to the space?
Re: Claude outage – Resolved
#10A nice chance to try sonnet again, must say, I'm not missing the load bearing assumptions, honest read of the permission matrix, what's genuinely a Django convention and what's a design choice, what's worth my thinking, and what's worth being precise about.
Long story short, it seems to be faster and less vocal but not much dumber (it's just my thinking partner, so I read a lot of the output as I create a large data model).