Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Muse Spark 1.3

developer.meta.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

381–390 of 475 posts

Re: Muse Spark 1.3

#381

Post by cma »

jmward01 wrote: post #174

muse-spark-1.3-contributor. Say what you want and Meta, changing the pricing to explicitly say 'we train on this and value it this much' is what every model provider should do. As a side note, it is now completely obvious how much stealing my tokens for training is worth to model providers. I avoid/pay extra/try my best to make sure I am not getting trained on but it seems like it keeps popping up that I missed a set…

We already had a good idea of how valuable it is from how much X.ai acquired Cursor for, and the near-immediate improvements to their coding scores.

Re: Muse Spark 1.3

#382

Post by coverband »

simonw wrote: post #3

llm -m meta-ai/muse-spark-1.3 "Generate an SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle" https://tools.simonwillison.net/markdown-svg-renderer?url=ht... 4.2266 cents, 38 seconds. For comparison here's Muse Spark 1.2, which animated it without me asking it to: https://tools.simonwillison.net/markdown-svg-renderer?url=ht... The 1.3 one is definitely better - better bicycle frame, better wing, better pelican hat. UPDATE: Here's an…

The pelican is for the last gen of LLMs -- have you tried a penguin instead?

Re: Muse Spark 1.3

#383

Post by cbg0 »

mgaunard wrote: post #15

They could have just called the article "struggling to remain relevant"

So was AMD for a while and then consumers kept getting the same repackaged CPU from Intel for years. Competition is great and you should always root for the underdog.

Re: Muse Spark 1.3

#384

Post by stanac »

UltraSane wrote: post #263
wewewedxfgdf wrote: post #212

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

If you could actually hand write SVG code on the spot that looked like a realistic pelican riding a bike I would want to hire you for SOMETHING.

I often do hand write SVG icons. I know roughly what I want, it's less messy compared to using an editor (cleaner, smaller xml, easier to hand-edit later if needed). Path arc is my nemesis, otherwise it's not that hard. Pelican would take some time, but same as software development, you split it into smaller chunks and do one at the time.

Main problem in complex icon is remembering which (x, y) point is used in which element, with background grid is helpful here. I was even thinking about making extended SVG language with variables for (x, y) points.

Re: Muse Spark 1.3

#385

Post by [deleted] »

avarun wrote: post #314
dcl wrote: post #299

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Thats not exactly 'validated'. Feels very noisy, it is not a good bar for either - does this code do what the user actually asked - is this code actually 'good' There would be so many examples of coding projects that these models began or attempted to work in, that were abandoned because the models were floundering. I would imagine the labs have some decent ways to produce novel requirements and then actually validat…

This is exactly what RLVR is, and the reason that models have improved so much at verifiable domains like coding and math while not so much on unverifiable ones like writing and UI design.

[deleted]

Re: Muse Spark 1.3

#386

Post by pegasus »

atemerev wrote: post #369
MadameMinty wrote: post #365

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Buddy, admitting your thought processes forcibly terminate on pre-programmed keywords isn't a flex.

Why "terminate", Marxist philosophy is a legitimate topic, deserving to be studied. Like a rich sci-fi lore or a history of Tarot magic. Deep, fascinating, and wrong.

And yet you terminated. Which would be the correct thing to do if Marxist philosophy would be wrong on all counts, as you explicitly state. Which of course, it isn't.

Re: Muse Spark 1.3

#387

Post by menaerus »

simonw wrote: post #325
m00dy wrote: post #286

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I see no point having these pelicans used for anything related model qualification.

At this point the only thing they're useful for is visualizing the differences between effort levels and roughly tracking the progression of models within a specific model family. And they still do that really well!

I don't see how useful this benchmark at all is for tracking the progression of models. I am not intending to bash on you personally but this is useless. People who are using AI models everyday are for sure not interested how close the AI model can visualize the pelican but they are interested in how they will perform on their daily tasks at work or private use. Correlation between doing good on pelican task and doing good on actual work you need to do is close to zero.

Re: Muse Spark 1.3

#389

Post by ImprobableTruth »

tintor wrote: post #378
TiredOfLife wrote: post #133

Earlier quoted context omitted.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bird_feet_and_legs#/media/File... Bird knees bend same way human ones do

Here is a photo of Pelican: https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2F...

That's the ankle. The actual knee is hidden in the feathers of the body.

Re: Muse Spark 1.3

#390

Post by wartywhoa23 »

I wonder if any commenters here were among those who used to ridicule the rate at which new JS frameworks kept popping up in the 2010s, and the amount of heroic zeal required to never miss the bandwagon?
Post reply on HN