41–50 of 346 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Your vague handwavey manner of writing sounds very presidential.
It's actually very specific. Look up the previous abuses of the US Postal Inspections Bureau and you will see exactly what I mean and why I've said it the way I've said it.
“Just look up vague abuses that I’m claiming happened with no evidence”
[flagged]
That's just fear mongering. Absentee voting by mail has been a thing for centuries. Attempting to limit it to people who are unable to vote in person doesn't do anything to make it more secure, and is a very weak control. It's not like they're going to check up on every single person who claims to have a specific reason they can't get to the polls. Beyond that, no-excuse absentee ballots have been a thing in many sta…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's actually very specific. Look up the previous abuses of the US Postal Inspections Bureau and you will see exactly what I mean and why I've said it the way I've said it.
“It’s very specific” “Just look up vague abuses that I’m claiming happened with no evidence”
Here is one instance among many.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Your vague handwavey manner of writing sounds very presidential.
It's actually very specific. Look up the previous abuses of the US Postal Inspections Bureau and you will see exactly what I mean and why I've said it the way I've said it.
[flagged]
Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's actually very specific. Look up the previous abuses of the US Postal Inspections Bureau and you will see exactly what I mean and why I've said it the way I've said it.
"Specific" would involve some sort of detail about what these abuses were, or when they happened, or something beyond just "previous abuses of the US Postal Inspections Bureau."
[flagged]
(No, I don't support it regardless, but surely even if you do you could recognize that the timeframe is way too short).
[flagged]
How much fraud happens because of mail-in or early voting?