Show HN: Codeknow – Architecture health scores for any codebase, no LLM needed
1–5 of 5 posts
Re: Show HN: Codeknow – Architecture health scores for any codebase, no LLM needed
#2How do you calculate tech debt? Every code scanner usually has a unique definition based on what they can measure. I'm interested to know what yours is and how you chose it.
Re: Show HN: Codeknow – Architecture health scores for any codebase, no LLM needed
#3This looks potentially useful.
When I tried this on a Rust project it said to run "codegraph cluster-only ". but I had to first uv pip install codegraph, and then codegraph -h did not have any cluster-only (it had -o and --object-only). (codegraph cluster-only fails with an error.) The -o output was hard to understand.
Maybe a web-based version that takes a github repo URL and analyzes that might be a better way to demo this? After trying that a user could install locally and use with an LLM for more in-depth results.
I wanted to try this on a small, simple Rust project before trying it on a large, complex Rust project. My Rust projects tend to be multi-component (each "component" is a multi-crate workspace). How large a project have you tested this on? How did you test this on all the supported languages? How can I add a language that you do not yet support?
Re: Show HN: Codeknow – Architecture health scores for any codebase, no LLM needed
#4How do you calculate tech debt? Every code scanner usually has a unique definition based on what they can measure. I'm interested to know what yours is and how you chose it.
[flagged]
Re: Show HN: Codeknow – Architecture health scores for any codebase, no LLM needed
#5This looks potentially useful. When I tried this on a Rust project it said to run "codegraph cluster-only ". but I had to first uv pip install codegraph, and then codegraph -h did not have any cluster-only (it had -o and --object-only). (codegraph cluster-only fails with an error.) The -o output was hard to understand. Maybe a web-based version that takes a github repo URL and analyzes that might be a better way to d…
[flagged]