Who coined the phrase "cyber" for security related things lol. It's so 1999.
Gemini 3.8 Flash and 3.8 Flash Cyber
121–130 of 699 posts
Re: Gemini 3.8 Flash and 3.8 Flash Cyber
#122I've been using Gemini 3.7 for my personal trip planning app. Across multiple benchmarks, it ranks higher on everything I tried: - Real world knowledge (when a thing opens and closes, the geographic region, historical facts). It's also the best at taking a cluster of places and working out a visiting order. - Photo ranking (which photo should be the hero). Gemini can tell whether a photo is of the thing or of the vie…
"Claude 3.7"?
I asked Claude to fix the grammar of my comment, and it changed "I am using 3.7 for" to "I've been using Claude 3.7", so they sneaked their own name on it.
Re: Gemini 3.8 Flash and 3.8 Flash Cyber
#123Earlier quoted context omitted.
This is in comparison to Fable: > https://tools.simonwillison.net/markdown-svg-renderer?url=ht... > Took just under 14 minutes to generate, and at 65927 output tokens cost me a hefty $3.30! So 50x cheaper - and how much faster?
The Gemini models have openly trained for SVG output, apparently with a specialism on animals in forms of transport! https://twitter.com/JeffDean/status/2024525132266688757
I don’t know if you’re joking, but I don’t see anything in the linked tweet which suggests that is the case
Re: Gemini 3.8 Flash and 3.8 Flash Cyber
#124The biggest problem with Gemini is that its performance degrades the longer you use it for coding. Is it just me?
Re: Gemini 3.8 Flash and 3.8 Flash Cyber
#125After struggling with Gemini for months, I think the trick to getting the most out of the model is writing a really solid personal intelligence/instructions prompt. The results are night and day in terms of performance.
Re: Gemini 3.8 Flash and 3.8 Flash Cyber
#126Earlier quoted context omitted.
"Claude 3.7"?
I asked Claude to fix the grammar of my comment, and it changed "I am using 3.7 for" to "I've been using Claude 3.7", so they sneaked their own name on it.
incredible. further evidence supporting my personal stance to never ever let an LLM write or edit my writing intended for another human being to read. this is all me, baby
Re: Gemini 3.8 Flash and 3.8 Flash Cyber
#127been absolutely loving 3.7 flash for coding. it feels very fast and quality is decent for implementing product features. usually use opus or sol for hardcore debugging.
Re: Gemini 3.8 Flash and 3.8 Flash Cyber
#128After struggling with Gemini for months, I think the trick to getting the most out of the model is writing a really solid personal intelligence/instructions prompt. The results are night and day in terms of performance.
slot machine addict thinks if he pushes buttons in a certain order the odds get better.
In all seriousness, gemini has the best interactive planning document/orchestration. Tell it to create a plan document and work through it with it and it will preform really well(in antigravity products). But this is the case with plan modes with every model, I just think the interactive document that antigravity uses is really well thought out.
Re: Gemini 3.8 Flash and 3.8 Flash Cyber
#129Currently top at https://deepswe.datacurve.ai - beating Opus 5! https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/gemini-3-8-flash shows an intelligence score of 59, the same as Opus 5 medium! Wow - for a flash model this seems to benchmark powerfully. Remains to be seen what it is like to use.
As of writing this comment, Claude Opus 5 has an intelligence score of 63, not 59 (it's not the same as Gemini 3.8 Flash). With a score of 59, Gemini 3.8 Flash is in eighth place, falling behind even Grok 4.6, Kimi k3, and GLM 5.3. https://imgur.com/a/BMOJBED
They are all much larger and more expensive models. Google does not have a frontier model right now, but for cheap ones, they are better than event the chinese models now.