If there was some kind of fixed minimum compensation - even a single dollar per affected person - and strict liability (doesn't matter how you allegedly did everything to protect the data, if it leaked it's on you), companies would suddenly be very motivated to a) secure b) minimize the data they hold. Without penalties, e.g. Hertz has little reason not to keep 10+ years of drivers licenses just in case they come in…
FBI Probes Service Selling 153M+ Drivers Licenses
221–230 of 313 posts
Re: FBI Probes Service Selling 153M+ Drivers Licenses
#222Earlier quoted context omitted.
Anyone can request their birth certificate in the jurisdiction of recording. There is absolutely no mechanism by which a request for that documentation could be refused because of someone’s race or a grudge.
What do you mean no mechanism? People can just say no? What I think you mean is that they’re are mechanisms today to combat folks saying no, but nothing stops (only punushes) people from saying no. It’s a lot harder these days given the 60 years of progress
Re: FBI Probes Service Selling 153M+ Drivers Licenses
#223Earlier quoted context omitted.
We don't live in the Jim Crow South anymore - you're making an extreme stretch here to try and paint a picture that isn't accurate. My point stands.
Your point is laying in a ditch bleeding to death. There are loads of people alive today who personally suffered from Jim Crow. These practices continued right through 1968, and were revived in Texas between 2013 and 2016.
Stop fear-mongering. One person doing something wrong one time does not constitute any sort of noticeable or wide-scale practice and the fact that if such an event occurs it makes national news and is fixed goes to show that the public is opposed to these practices, they are exceptionally rare.
Or perhaps there are "some cases" of voter fraud too ;)
Re: FBI Probes Service Selling 153M+ Drivers Licenses
#224Earlier quoted context omitted.
This is a fine debate tactic — dumping a load of text without the proper context. But I’m not debating here. I’m plainly stating the fact that US states are not sovereign entities. In practical terms, there is no such thing as a semi-sovereign entity.
Folks have provided great information. It's up to you to decide to accept the facts or continue to double down on your private worldview, but it won't serve you well to be ignorant of the facts here.
Re: FBI Probes Service Selling 153M+ Drivers Licenses
#225Earlier quoted context omitted.
Your point is laying in a ditch bleeding to death. There are loads of people alive today who personally suffered from Jim Crow. These practices continued right through 1968, and were revived in Texas between 2013 and 2016.
No it's not. It's alive and well and just bought a new house. Stop fear-mongering. One person doing something wrong one time does not constitute any sort of noticeable or wide-scale practice and the fact that if such an event occurs it makes national news and is fixed goes to show that the public is opposed to these practices, they are exceptionally rare. Or perhaps there are "some cases" of voter fraud too ;)
Re: FBI Probes Service Selling 153M+ Drivers Licenses
#226I know some modern, normal countries have done variations of this but the US missed a golden opportunity to give everyone an RSA keypair when they were coerced into signing up for an Enhanced/REAL ID. Instead of scanning, taking photos of or holding licences up to webcams (I was asked to do this recently) you provide your public key or, better, a signed message containing the name, website or other identifier which g…
[0] due to constant undermining by said surveillance industry, which has now basically become "too big to fail"
Re: FBI Probes Service Selling 153M+ Drivers Licenses
#227Earlier quoted context omitted.
We don't live in the Jim Crow South anymore - you're making an extreme stretch here to try and paint a picture that isn't accurate. My point stands.
Your point is laying in a ditch bleeding to death. There are loads of people alive today who personally suffered from Jim Crow. These practices continued right through 1968, and were revived in Texas between 2013 and 2016.
Re: FBI Probes Service Selling 153M+ Drivers Licenses
#228Earlier quoted context omitted.
No it's not. It's alive and well and just bought a new house. Stop fear-mongering. One person doing something wrong one time does not constitute any sort of noticeable or wide-scale practice and the fact that if such an event occurs it makes national news and is fixed goes to show that the public is opposed to these practices, they are exceptionally rare. Or perhaps there are "some cases" of voter fraud too ;)
There are about 600,000 American citizens alive today who lack traceable documentation of their birth due to Jim Crow policies.
Somehow this wasn't a problem for them, while whites-only water fountains still live rent-free in your mind.
Following your logic, no problem is solvable until you have eliminated all potential issues and outliers. No startups would ever get off the ground with that attitude.
Re: FBI Probes Service Selling 153M+ Drivers Licenses
#229Earlier quoted context omitted.
This would probably be considered “disenfranchising” because people would have a hard time keeping track of their public key and the process to recover it would involve having to take off work, transportation, etc.
[flagged]
Re: FBI Probes Service Selling 153M+ Drivers Licenses
#230Earlier quoted context omitted.
Which “normal, modern countries” have done variations of this?
Not sure I'd call it "normal", we're exceptional! :) But Spain does have this, I have a literal digital certificate linked to my name, sitting in my browser, that I use for logging in to various government services and also use to sign+submit my taxes. Apparently there even is a page in English explaining how it works, in case others are interested: https://www.fnmt.es/en/ceres > The CERES project (Spanish Certificat…
- MiDNI > https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=es.gob.interio... - Mi DGT > https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.dgt.midgt