Gemini 3.8 Flash and 3.8 Flash Cyber
31–40 of 699 posts
Re: Gemini 3.8 Flash and 3.8 Flash Cyber
#32Gemini is getting less useful with each update. I could edit a pdf with the 3-pro model before but 3.1-pro couldn't edit the given pdf nor it could generate one for me.
Re: Gemini 3.8 Flash and 3.8 Flash Cyber
#33But where is Gemini 3.5 pro?
Re: Gemini 3.8 Flash and 3.8 Flash Cyber
#34Re: Gemini 3.8 Flash and 3.8 Flash Cyber
#35Gemini is getting less useful with each update. I could edit a pdf with the 3-pro model before but 3.1-pro couldn't edit the given pdf nor it could generate one for me.
Re: Gemini 3.8 Flash and 3.8 Flash Cyber
#36Currently top at https://deepswe.datacurve.ai - beating Opus 5! https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/gemini-3-8-flash shows an intelligence score of 59, the same as Opus 5 medium! Wow - for a flash model this seems to benchmark powerfully. Remains to be seen what it is like to use.
Re: Gemini 3.8 Flash and 3.8 Flash Cyber
#37model card https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49537354 (doesn't 404)
[1] For tone and instruction following, a positive percentage increase represents an improvement in the tone of the model on sensitive topics and the model’s ability to follow instructions while remaining safe compared to Gemini 3 Flash. We mark improvements in green and regressions in red.
Gemini 3 Flash?! So is Gemini 3.8 Flash less safe than 3.7 Flash in all areas besides Text to Text Safety (and identical on Image to Text Safety)?Why bother with a column “Gemini 3.8 Flash vs. Gemini 3.7 Flash” when you’re going to disregard the label for 20% of it? Also is the “Tone” label short for “Tone and Instruction Following”?
Chartcrime, the major AI lab tradition.
Re: Gemini 3.8 Flash and 3.8 Flash Cyber
#38Re: Gemini 3.8 Flash and 3.8 Flash Cyber
#39Gemini is getting less useful with each update. I could edit a pdf with the 3-pro model before but 3.1-pro couldn't edit the given pdf nor it could generate one for me.
3.5 pro doesn't exist yet?