Quasar 438B: Europe's Leading AI Model
31–40 of 134 posts
Re: Quasar 438B: Europe's Leading AI Model
#32I do not want open weight models from China to be the only viable locally hosted things (deepseek v4 flash 0731 Q8, qwen 3.8-flash-next Q8, GLM-5.3-Flash) in the under 200GB RAM class. I want to see things like Mistral and Laguna (non-CN) succeed. I have spent about a week using Laguna S 2.1 as a test and while I wasn't blown away by its capabilities, it's also totally acceptable for many purposes. I do hope these Qu…
It's not a small niche. Anything touching European resident personal data must only be done by Euro AI Act compliant AIs. So, hosted in Europe at least (unclear to me rn, would love to learn the exact criteria).
Re: Quasar 438B: Europe's Leading AI Model
#33I do not want open weight models from China to be the only viable locally hosted things (deepseek v4 flash 0731 Q8, qwen 3.8-flash-next Q8, GLM-5.3-Flash) in the under 200GB RAM class. I want to see things like Mistral and Laguna (non-CN) succeed. I have spent about a week using Laguna S 2.1 as a test and while I wasn't blown away by its capabilities, it's also totally acceptable for many purposes. I do hope these Qu…
> That's a niche which exists It's not a small niche. Anything touching European resident personal data must only be done by Euro AI Act compliant AIs. So, hosted in Europe at least (unclear to me rn, would love to learn the exact criteria).
Re: Quasar 438B: Europe's Leading AI Model
#34As a European: I don’t care where an open weight model comes from.
Re: Quasar 438B: Europe's Leading AI Model
#35As a European: I don’t care where an open weight model comes from.
As with all of the EU's dependancies on Tech with the US, the idea of "I don't care where my DNS servers are" is starting to be an oversight.
But thanks for your opinion.
Re: Quasar 438B: Europe's Leading AI Model
#36As a European: I don’t care where an open weight model comes from.
For instance, I heard one of the Chinese models has some interesting "history" "facts" built into it. That's major, and can influence a lot more than just asking it for that particular history lesson.
I don't want just 1 LLM. I want a great LLM from every major region. I will probably still prefer my own region, but I still want the others to be an option.
Re: Quasar 438B: Europe's Leading AI Model
#37Earlier quoted context omitted.
That's a very limiting view of things. A model, even an open weight one, is never neutral, it is an encoding of a way of viewing the world . What kind of "alignment" are AI labs optimizing for? Ideological alignment is the full term, self-censored into something more technological-sounding. Every model has people behind it rating what it should and shouldn't say. Every time you ask a model and trust its answer, you b…
>I don't want my model to reflect the views of American oligarchs or Chinese cadres. I want European values of enlightenment and humanitarianism to be the default. I don't want AI models to reflect any kind of values whatsoever. I have my own views - thank you - and I don't need other throwing their values in my face using AI. I prefer AI models not being trained ideologically.
Re: Quasar 438B: Europe's Leading AI Model
#38Re: Quasar 438B: Europe's Leading AI Model
#39How can it be that a 438B model is worse than Qwen3.8-27B? Are these benchmarks totally gamed?
Re: Quasar 438B: Europe's Leading AI Model
#40I wish for this company to have great models. I am glad to see such good scores. I see they have a HuggingFace account[0] and they fine-tuned GPT-OSS, Nemotron, and Qwen, in the past under new names. There are some things about it that make me worry though. • They don't indicate the active parameter count, or indicate whether they pretrained the model. It could be a MiniMax M3 finetuning, as the parameter count almos…