Apple reveals 'shocking evidence' from ex-employee's MacBook in OpenAI suit
1–10 of 205 posts
Re: Apple reveals 'shocking evidence' from ex-employee's MacBook in OpenAI suit
#2Re: Apple reveals 'shocking evidence' from ex-employee's MacBook in OpenAI suit
#3- Mr. Liu not only downloaded a confidential Apple circuit schematic but also used it in his work at OpenAI;
- Far from his unauthorized access to Apple’s third-party cloud storage being unknown to him, Mr. Liu and others at OpenAI were well-aware of that access;
- Mr. Liu, upon learning of Apple’s internal investigation of him, sent instructions for destroying evidence to an OpenAI colleague who confirmed she would comply; and
- Mr. Liu used a tool in his work at OpenAI that has the same name as an internal Apple engineering application used for Apple development work.
Re: Apple reveals 'shocking evidence' from ex-employee's MacBook in OpenAI suit
#4Re: Apple reveals 'shocking evidence' from ex-employee's MacBook in OpenAI suit
#5Reminds me of the story of an ex-Coca-Cola employee who offered to sell the secret recipe to Pepsi. Pepsi immediately let Coca-Cola know and it was handled. Not a good look for OpenAI. They come off as desperate and unprofessional.
At one time most people had respect, even people at the top, now many people just do what they want. Plus most of the time they get away with it.
Re: Apple reveals 'shocking evidence' from ex-employee's MacBook in OpenAI suit
#6Reminds me of the story of an ex-Coca-Cola employee who offered to sell the secret recipe to Pepsi. Pepsi immediately let Coca-Cola know and it was handled. Not a good look for OpenAI. They come off as desperate and unprofessional.
Re: Apple reveals 'shocking evidence' from ex-employee's MacBook in OpenAI suit
#7Reminds me of the story of an ex-Coca-Cola employee who offered to sell the secret recipe to Pepsi. Pepsi immediately let Coca-Cola know and it was handled. Not a good look for OpenAI. They come off as desperate and unprofessional.
Not really OpenAI but today's society. I say this started with the "just do it and ask for forgiveness later" attitude that started maybe 20 or 30 years ago. At one time most people had respect, even people at the top, now many people just do what they want. Plus most of the time they get away with it.
Re: Apple reveals 'shocking evidence' from ex-employee's MacBook in OpenAI suit
#8Reminds me of the story of an ex-Coca-Cola employee who offered to sell the secret recipe to Pepsi. Pepsi immediately let Coca-Cola know and it was handled. Not a good look for OpenAI. They come off as desperate and unprofessional.
Not really OpenAI but today's society. I say this started with the "just do it and ask for forgiveness later" attitude that started maybe 20 or 30 years ago. At one time most people had respect, even people at the top, now many people just do what they want. Plus most of the time they get away with it.
"just do it and ask for forgiveness later"
is what the entire LLM industry is based on. They swallowed up all of society’s copyrighted texts without really asking for permission from anyone. This is just par for the course for them it seems unfortunately.
Re: Apple reveals 'shocking evidence' from ex-employee's MacBook in OpenAI suit
#9Happened at a (large) company I worked for in the past. A devops guy stole the DB ahead of going to work with a rival, he was caught and the rival of course wanted nothing to do with it. I'm not sure of his fate but it couldn't have been much fun.
The key difference here seems to be that OpenAI very much wants something to do with it.
Re: Apple reveals 'shocking evidence' from ex-employee's MacBook in OpenAI suit
#10Earlier quoted context omitted.
Not really OpenAI but today's society. I say this started with the "just do it and ask for forgiveness later" attitude that started maybe 20 or 30 years ago. At one time most people had respect, even people at the top, now many people just do what they want. Plus most of the time they get away with it.
We can fix this by holding each other accountable. Peer pressure and community sanctions of bad actors will result in the changes we need.
It's been demonstrated over centuries that this is unreliable. We end up needing a third party (commonly governments) to step in and establish rules and referee behavior. We wouldn't have an EPA, FCC, SEC, or many other organizations and laws if private actors could successfully police themselves.