Live data from Hacker News

Apple caught off guard by AI demand for Mac Mini and Mac Studio

macrumors.com

611–620 of 636 posts

Re: Apple caught off guard by AI demand for Mac Mini and Mac Studio

#611

Earlier quoted context omitted.

32GB is not enough, it's unified/shared memory, you need to have space for usual system and user apps/services. 64GB+ or dedicated 48GB (2x24 on GPUs) is IMHO absolute minimum.

32GB of fast unified memory is enough for Qwen 3.8 27B. - 16GB for the weights at Q4 - 9GB for the full 256K context at Q8 - 7GB spare for overhead and system. The problem is that these Macs have 32GB of slow unified memory. Edit: I'm thinking of a headless Mac mini, if you meant running it on the same machine you're using of course you'll need more memory, but LLMs are best served from a headless server so that's wh…

Your agent(s) need to work on something, ie. running TypeScript, your app, your tests, Docker, Redis and/or database you need to run harness and user side apps ie. VScode, browser etc. it all adds up quickly.

Single user conversation spawns multiple parallel backend conversations, you need extra room for it as well, not just single context.

This plus usual apps like Mail, Spotify, iTerm2, SourceTree etc. also fill in memory.

Also 4 bit quantization is already quite aggressive compromise (measurable but sometimes acceptable loss, compared to ie. 8 bits which are often practically lossless) – for weights it's ok'ish, sometimes (especially if model was trained as 4 bit quants aware), but activations need to stay at higher bits taking more memory, otherwise quality degrades a lot.

For a dedicated headless setup, I’d probably use something like NVIDIA DGX Spark rather than a Mac (to be more precise NVIDIA GB10 Grace Blackwell from other suppliers than directly NVidia, they are much cheaper and have same insides). Linux is much better for running headless server, you also get standard NVIDIA/CUDA ecosystem instead of being tied to Metal/macOS.

For people who are interested in buying IMHO I'd wait a bit – next generation of Spark and/or Macs that are going to come out next year will be much better / will cross the line of being actually useful, not just a toy with goldfish LLM.

Re: Apple caught off guard by AI demand for Mac Mini and Mac Studio

#612
> Even so, enterprise's rush toward powerful desktop Macs more broadly took Apple by surprise. The company reportedly did not possess an engineering team dedicated to business customers or staff focused on developer relations, and lacked an enterprise AI strategy.

They did have one... Xserve. Or the macOS Server package you could buy on the App Store. But there hasn't been an actual device that people could buy for many a year, and most of what enterprises need (aka fleet management, software deployment etc) has been left to third parties like JAMF.

Re: Apple caught off guard by AI demand for Mac Mini and Mac Studio

#613
post #484

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Apple does not have a psyops division This sounds exactly like the kind thing that someone running a psyop for Apple would say.

This is exactly the kind of paranoid conspiracy thinking I was talking about. If you see red yarn between everything, you're impervious to reality. Honestly, I'm an Apple user since 1988 and shareholder. I use my full-ass name on hn. I wish they'd give me money to promote the brand, but in reality they have something even more valuable than paid shitposting: authentic word of mouth and devoted users. That comes out o…

I prefer the term "unwitting accomplice", others prefer the term "useful idiot".

Re: Apple caught off guard by AI demand for Mac Mini and Mac Studio

#614

Apple was also allegedly "caught off guard" by the Macbook Neo demand. I don't really see how they couldn't see the Local AI demand or demand for a cheaper Macbooks. This just reads like marketing imo.

There's no indication there's a limited supply by Apple or you cannot get one. I don't see a marketing angle here, just speculation from "The Information", and people love to speculate for clicks so there's the motive.

Shipping times have been increasing over the last several months.

Re: Apple caught off guard by AI demand for Mac Mini and Mac Studio

#615
post #164

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This kind of stuff is available off the shelf at any major cloud provider.

Guaranteed privacy is available off the shelf?

Why is the security in your home lab so much better than Amazons? Be specific.

Re: Apple caught off guard by AI demand for Mac Mini and Mac Studio

#616

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Oh no doubt. But one does have the guarantee that no bits left their home and that's a big one for some. The low hanging fruit stuff for me is more something I use it for because I have the local LLM setup running anyway. It wasn't the reason I bought it, but now that it's there I might just as well use it as much as I can.

> Oh no doubt. But one does have the guarantee that no bits left their home and that's a big one for some. No, this is a big misconception, and part of the cargo cult. Use cases like the parent's are essentially about having a local LLM handle the leftover tasks. By that point, a lot of bits (main/big tasks) have already left home anyway.

I'm just saying that's why I bought my local setup. I do use cloud but only for stuff where privacy is irrelevant.

Re: Apple caught off guard by AI demand for Mac Mini and Mac Studio

#617

I'm convinced that this is just guerilla marketing from Apple. When this started spreading a day or two ago, it was all from no-name spam media sites that are paid to publish articles. They all claimed "a source" is where they got the intel, without specifying the source. It was spreading like wildfire on socials. The same thing happened with Mac Mini's and OpenClaw. Nobody cared about or was using Mac Mini's for Ope…

I'm convinced that this is just guerilla marketing from Apple. I'm not. I have an M4 Mac Mini running 24/7 so I can use it as my Claude Code machine when I'm on the go. Why would they do a guerilla marketing campaign now if their Macs are generally sold out despite nearly doubling the Mac Mini price in the last few months?

So your argument against this being guerilla marketing is that you bought a Mac Mini after seeing the guerilla marketing, to do the thing that you didn't need a Mac Mini to do.

Re: Apple caught off guard by AI demand for Mac Mini and Mac Studio

#618
post #158

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I feel like iOS 27 is a step in this direction, in terms of sanding off the rough edges of iOS 26.

Wish they would sand off liquid glass

Liquid Glass has been refined significantly in the 27 OS's and you have more control over the degree of transparency. Overall stability and performance are better as well.

Re: Apple caught off guard by AI demand for Mac Mini and Mac Studio

#619
post #158

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Wish they would sand off liquid glass

Liquid Glass has been refined significantly in the 27 OS's and you have more control over the degree of transparency. Overall stability and performance are better as well.

> Liquid Glass has been refined significantly

I’ll take significantly removed.

What’s there to refine - Liquid Glass is the single most pointless, wasteful, accessibility destroying ‘feature’ I have ever seen

Re: Apple caught off guard by AI demand for Mac Mini and Mac Studio

#620
post #564
post #490

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Suppose you have a 6 months lead time to order volumes of parts for a new product launch. 4 months before the launch you see a new use case developing that's going to dramatically boost demand at launch. Even though you saw this coming 4 months before the launch, at the launch time itself you're still caught off guard. Demand is still dramatically higher than your capacity to meet it, and that's still going to be tru…

For a company like Sony, you would say they failed to meet demand. Under Apple's reality distortion you instead must say that they were surprised by the demand.

Er, would I?

Projecting much?

Post reply on HN