Live data from Hacker News

Show HN: Laser Graffiti

laser.consti.de

41–50 of 65 posts

Re: Show HN: Laser Graffiti

#41
post #29

Hi HN and สวัสดีครับ! I remember seeing this the first time in Vienna by a friend of mine, Michi who came back from NYC and I believe he learned about it at the local hacker space at the time: NYC resistor. I knew Michi through the Metalab, our hacker space in Vienna. Originally the idea seems to have been from the Graffiti Research Lab, which is also what I've linked to on my page and in the repo's Readme. I think t…

Sushimako, my YC cofounder actually reminded me of some more details:

Here's a video [0] of Bre Pettis talking with Michi about Laser Tagging from the Graffiti Research Lab in Austria [1].

And the app by Michi and oneup (my other YC cofounder!) was written in Processing.

[0] https://youtu.be/isfrCIhQ5HE [1] https://graffitiresearchlab.at

Re: Show HN: Laser Graffiti

#42

While this is interesting, what I really wanted to see was more 'graffiti' and less 'laser'. Graffiti, fundamentally, is a defacement of public property as a form of artistic self expression. To that end, why not combine this with a laser engraver instead of a laser pointer ? Imagine hooking this up and then literally carving your graffiti into the side of a brick building. Or burning it into the paint on a metal con…

WARNING: DO NOT LOOK INTO LASER WITH REMAINING EYE

Re: Show HN: Laser Graffiti

#43

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Graffiti, fundamentally, is a defacement of public property Both wrong. Neither is defacement the point nor doing it to public property. Fundamentally it's a visual art form and whether that's on private or public property is insubstantial. It's surely intervoven with anarchic protest and that's where the defacement angle comes in. Similarly, public property as a symbol of the state that is rejected plays often a r…

Both statements are wrong. But yours is wrong-er. You are thinking of street art. Or just spray paint art. The whole point of graffiti is to "get up". If you don't know what getting up is, you should not be espousing any opinions on what graffiti is and isn't.

In fact, I'm aware what it means and don't see how that and what I wrote are contradictory.

Though not everybody around here may know, so how about you educate folks instead of being condescending?

Getting your tag up somewhere can surely be considered art. It's fine if you personally don't, but you are not speaking for others. Nor is it clear why you feel entitled to explain to me what I am supposedly thinking.

Re: Show HN: Laser Graffiti

#44

While this is interesting, what I really wanted to see was more 'graffiti' and less 'laser'. Graffiti, fundamentally, is a defacement of public property as a form of artistic self expression. To that end, why not combine this with a laser engraver instead of a laser pointer ? Imagine hooking this up and then literally carving your graffiti into the side of a brick building. Or burning it into the paint on a metal con…

>coolness as a function of danger

Well now you got me started. Why not engrave your message into the surface of a celestial body via a carefully aimed series of orbital bombardments?

Re: Show HN: Laser Graffiti

#45

While this is interesting, what I really wanted to see was more 'graffiti' and less 'laser'. Graffiti, fundamentally, is a defacement of public property as a form of artistic self expression. To that end, why not combine this with a laser engraver instead of a laser pointer ? Imagine hooking this up and then literally carving your graffiti into the side of a brick building. Or burning it into the paint on a metal con…

> Graffiti, fundamentally, is a defacement of public property Both wrong. Neither is defacement the point nor doing it to public property. Fundamentally it's a visual art form and whether that's on private or public property is insubstantial. It's surely intervoven with anarchic protest and that's where the defacement angle comes in. Similarly, public property as a symbol of the state that is rejected plays often a r…

Reciting ancient Roman graffiti

https://youtu.be/-qSETCKlzQQ

Re: Show HN: Laser Graffiti

#46

While this is interesting, what I really wanted to see was more 'graffiti' and less 'laser'. Graffiti, fundamentally, is a defacement of public property as a form of artistic self expression. To that end, why not combine this with a laser engraver instead of a laser pointer ? Imagine hooking this up and then literally carving your graffiti into the side of a brick building. Or burning it into the paint on a metal con…

Please tell me where you live. I'd like to come over and ruin your property with graffiti and see how you like it.

> defacement of public property

Plenty of graffiti is on private property.

About $15 billion is spent dealing with property destruction by graffiti. All of which is passed on to tax payers and consumers.

Re: Show HN: Laser Graffiti

#47

While this is interesting, what I really wanted to see was more 'graffiti' and less 'laser'. Graffiti, fundamentally, is a defacement of public property as a form of artistic self expression. To that end, why not combine this with a laser engraver instead of a laser pointer ? Imagine hooking this up and then literally carving your graffiti into the side of a brick building. Or burning it into the paint on a metal con…

> Graffiti, fundamentally, is a defacement of public property Both wrong. Neither is defacement the point nor doing it to public property. Fundamentally it's a visual art form and whether that's on private or public property is insubstantial. It's surely intervoven with anarchic protest and that's where the defacement angle comes in. Similarly, public property as a symbol of the state that is rejected plays often a r…

I will be happy to come over your place and destroy your stuff by adding my graffiti "art" to it

Re: Show HN: Laser Graffiti

#48

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Graffiti, fundamentally, is a defacement of public property Both wrong. Neither is defacement the point nor doing it to public property. Fundamentally it's a visual art form and whether that's on private or public property is insubstantial. It's surely intervoven with anarchic protest and that's where the defacement angle comes in. Similarly, public property as a symbol of the state that is rejected plays often a r…

I will be happy to come over your place and destroy your stuff by adding my graffiti "art" to it

I didn't say it's not damaging. But that's a side effect, not the goal.
Post reply on HN