Live data from Hacker News

Our decision on Cursor following its acquisition by SpaceX

openai.com

561–562 of 562 posts

Re: Our decision on Cursor following its acquisition by SpaceX

#561

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I appreciate its not helpful but its as helpful as imagining some absurd conspiratorial future. In the same vein I could ask if you're the CIA trying to suppress earnest conversation. It just does nothing but hand wring about a bunch of imagined nonsense.

I think the perceived situation is a matter of degree. I would say there's a measurable (almost overwhelming) amount of corporate influence already. I have no doubt there are agency operatives influencing discussion online, from recorded precedence. Calling the concept 'nonsense' is overly dismissive. Regardless, using that kind of claim to deflect from the premise isn't a compelling reason to invalidate the concept.…

I have no doubt you're a CIA agent. Nurse!

Re: Our decision on Cursor following its acquisition by SpaceX

#562

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There will be a moment where the government will depend so much on the tech that if the tech cuts the supply, they are f... Who do you think will rule at that point? They just cannot fight that, they do not have the technology these companies have.

"We have every location associated with you in the crosshairs of tamper proof missiles and surrounded by infantry with heavy vehicles. Do what we say or we will destroy you and everything you care about." And that's just the most obvious one. There are many other kinds of threats which are much more subtle. That is how governments traditionally stay in charge, and I expect the pattern to continue. Citizens simply don…

Not only force is a threat. When someone knows that the death of the rival is equivalent to ruining their own status, no matter how much additional force they have, things get much more balanced than you might think.
Post reply on HN