Earlier quoted context omitted.
I agree that ADHD is a serious condition for many people, and that it's overly romanticized and that isn't good when it comes to getting help for those that do need it. To that point, I'm going push back on this language just a bit: > you end up addicted and pretty much permanently require drugs to function well That is negatively framing medication, which if taken properly as prescribed is no different than any othe…
[flagged]
Reverse engineering my ADHD test
21–30 of 247 posts
Re: Reverse engineering my ADHD test
#22hi! author here, please let me know if you have any questions :-)
Re: Reverse engineering my ADHD test
#23[flagged]
No? First, even when I was taking it almost every day for three years, I kept forgetting to take it. Today, my last refill was in February this year.
I recommend against raw-dogging reality with ADHD without meds. At least so you have baseline "this is what normal feels like"
Re: Reverse engineering my ADHD test
#24[flagged]
I agree that ADHD is a serious condition for many people, and that it's overly romanticized and that isn't good when it comes to getting help for those that do need it. To that point, I'm going push back on this language just a bit: > you end up addicted and pretty much permanently require drugs to function well That is negatively framing medication, which if taken properly as prescribed is no different than any othe…
I'm on stimulants and I agree that the post you responded to needed reframing. But I think we do ourselves and anyone else who isn't "normal" in body or mind a huge disservice just focusing on acceptance of treatment when there are larger societal changes that could be made.
Re: Reverse engineering my ADHD test
#25[flagged]
The author of the article is contributing to this by using their medical diagnosis to "outsmart" the system for writing material. Presenting a proper ADHD assessment as merely an online test just adds fuel to the fire (and if this is the only interaction they had I am skeptical of the assessment procedure).
> and while treated ADHD can make you productive "all the time", you end up addicted and pretty much permanently require drugs to function well
That's an unfair and sweeping characterization of the immediate therapeutic benefits and long-term health outcomes of individuals.
Re: Reverse engineering my ADHD test
#26hi! author here, please let me know if you have any questions :-)
Re: Reverse engineering my ADHD test
#27Yeah man I can go ahead and let you know early if you want.
Re: Reverse engineering my ADHD test
#28hi! author here, please let me know if you have any questions :-)
Also, congratulations, once you figure it out your life is going to change for the better in a way you can't currently understand (literally, lacking the brain regions and/or development for it, take it from me), but the process can kinda suck a lot, so stick with it, it's worth it in the end, wherever you end up.
Re: Reverse engineering my ADHD test
#29Opening up devtools during ADHD test is so ADHD, almost as if he didn't even need the psychiatrist to explain the results :D
In general, if you are in the industry, save yourself (and your kids) some trouble and get diagnosed before it becomes a problem.
Add: I wonder why they don't just give people some ritalin and ask if they feel calmed down? Except the obvious reason of course
Re: Reverse engineering my ADHD test
#30Earlier quoted context omitted.
Following through on the top comment, surely you realized when you decided to forgo the back half of the test that, had the program compensated for it, you were consciously leaning into the ADHD diagnosis, right?
Sure! However, I think at that point I just felt trapped and overwhelmed that I no longer cared about the test or its results.
He says while commenting on HN as CI runs...