Live data from Hacker News

RavynOS: Pre-alpha open-source OS based on Darwin, FreeBSD, Apple open-source

ravynos.com

21–30 of 148 posts

Re: RavynOS: Pre-alpha open-source OS based on Darwin, FreeBSD, Apple open-source

#21

[flagged]

Perhaps the biggest reason is that the existing FOSS OS world has little to offer for people who like a Mac-style desktop. It's possible to customize DEs to have a very shallow visual resemblance but the details are all wrong, with Windows, legacy Linux desktops, and even mobile operating systems (in e.g. the case of GNOME) exerting the greater bulk of design influence.

The question might then, "why not make this a DE instead?" to which the answer is that Mac users also like how the underpinnings of the OS work (or have worked in older releases) and would like to continue to use their favorite Mac apps, which isn't going to happen as long as any traditional Linux distribution is involved. Mac apps also have a design ethos that's rare among current native Linux apps, which drives demand for alternatives.

To do this properly it really needs to be a whole-OS endeavor.

Re: RavynOS: Pre-alpha open-source OS based on Darwin, FreeBSD, Apple open-source

#22

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> when you could run Darwin That's what this is. Darwin isn't installable today. Apple just dumps a bunch of source code. Previous attempts at making Darwin bootable didn't go far and had no GUI.

Four years and still pre-alpha. Stick a fork in it. There's also PureDarwin (?) which had been around forever but last I recall the lone developer was seriously ill and the project was not receiving help. I don't see how this would be any different. To everyone here cheering this on: when will you be contributing? Or are you just waiting to download it, run it once for the lulz, and drag it to the Trash?

> Four years and still pre-alpha. Stick a fork in it.

Who jammed a toe in your cheerios?

Re: RavynOS: Pre-alpha open-source OS based on Darwin, FreeBSD, Apple open-source

#23

Earlier quoted context omitted.

a lot of the kernel extensions are closed source proprietary. The core is still open but a lot of what makes modern Mac, Mac, are those kexts.

By referencing the 90s it is a reminder that Mac started on an entirely closed source kernel. It's a regression towards the Mac mean more than a regression away from it.

Correct, but to dismiss the NeXT contributions from BSD into modern mac and Darwin would be to dismiss Darwin entirely. Macintosh from the System7 days was a dramatically different beast.

Re: RavynOS: Pre-alpha open-source OS based on Darwin, FreeBSD, Apple open-source

#25

[flagged]

Perhaps the biggest reason is that the existing FOSS OS world has little to offer for people who like a Mac-style desktop. It's possible to customize DEs to have a very shallow visual resemblance but the details are all wrong, with Windows, legacy Linux desktops, and even mobile operating systems (in e.g. the case of GNOME) exerting the greater bulk of design influence. The question might then, "why not make this a D…

Didn't the Best Koreans rip off the Mac GUI in their home-grown spyware-laden Linux distro? Red Star Linux or whatever it's called.

I wonder if they have a GitHub...

Re: RavynOS: Pre-alpha open-source OS based on Darwin, FreeBSD, Apple open-source

#27
post #22

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Four years and still pre-alpha. Stick a fork in it. There's also PureDarwin (?) which had been around forever but last I recall the lone developer was seriously ill and the project was not receiving help. I don't see how this would be any different. To everyone here cheering this on: when will you be contributing? Or are you just waiting to download it, run it once for the lulz, and drag it to the Trash?

> Four years and still pre-alpha. Stick a fork in it. Who jammed a toe in your cheerios?

What will you personally be contributing to the project to help move things along?

Besides accolades on HN of course.

I'm being real here and frankly blind, empty support of open-source projects does zero to support them.

Re: RavynOS: Pre-alpha open-source OS based on Darwin, FreeBSD, Apple open-source

#28

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Perhaps the biggest reason is that the existing FOSS OS world has little to offer for people who like a Mac-style desktop. It's possible to customize DEs to have a very shallow visual resemblance but the details are all wrong, with Windows, legacy Linux desktops, and even mobile operating systems (in e.g. the case of GNOME) exerting the greater bulk of design influence. The question might then, "why not make this a D…

Didn't the Best Koreans rip off the Mac GUI in their home-grown spyware-laden Linux distro? Red Star Linux or whatever it's called. I wonder if they have a GitHub...

I haven't downloaded or played with it because I'd rather not toy with software so obviously full of landmines, but from what I've seen it also falls into the "surface level" bucket. It goes a little further than one might get by e.g. enabling KDE's global menubar and installing one of the Mac-themed Breeze forks, but not much.

Re: RavynOS: Pre-alpha open-source OS based on Darwin, FreeBSD, Apple open-source

#29
post #22

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Four years and still pre-alpha. Stick a fork in it. Who jammed a toe in your cheerios?

What will you personally be contributing to the project to help move things along? Besides accolades on HN of course. I'm being real here and frankly blind, empty support of open-source projects does zero to support them.

I'm actually the head lead developer in chief president. Now, your cheerios?

Re: RavynOS: Pre-alpha open-source OS based on Darwin, FreeBSD, Apple open-source

#30
post #26
post #24

I think any desktop operating systems has to present itself with at least a single screenshot. Why not one in the entire page?

And now that I have walked over the whole website: Why not a single screenshot anywhere?

I wager that maybe, probably, possibly, perhaps the GUI of this thing looks like ass and feels even worse. There used to be screenshots, you can google them. But maybe don’t.
Post reply on HN