Live data from Hacker News

ChatGPT Work Tool and Skill Reference

codex-tool-reference.simonw.chatgpt.site

21–30 of 74 posts

Re: ChatGPT Work Tool and Skill Reference

#21
post #11

I think the most interesting skill here is the control-browser one: https://codex-tool-reference.simonw.chatgpt.site/skills/cont... It tells ChatGPT Work how to launch a Playwright instance via its Node.js REPL, and tells it to run: nodeRepl.write(await browser.documentation()); To get further instructions. That method returns this text with full details about how to use the browser: https://codex-tool-reference.simo…

I'm guessing, but can be because then the skill will always fetch the latest docs.

Re: ChatGPT Work Tool and Skill Reference

#24

Meta comment: I've been wondering why AI-generated websites/artifacts/reports always have the same "look". It reminds me of Bootstrap (CSS Framework) days when every startup website looked the same. Are they following some sort of common guideline?

I think these guideline are built into the llms. After all with llms, any decision you don't take will be taken for you. For a so called slop site (Simon's words, not mine :P) I don't think they specified a style so the llm just decided the default it knows. One day I will run experiments (when I can afford it) trying to identify the "taste" of different llms.

Re: ChatGPT Work Tool and Skill Reference

#25
post #11

I think the most interesting skill here is the control-browser one: https://codex-tool-reference.simonw.chatgpt.site/skills/cont... It tells ChatGPT Work how to launch a Playwright instance via its Node.js REPL, and tells it to run: nodeRepl.write(await browser.documentation()); To get further instructions. That method returns this text with full details about how to use the browser: https://codex-tool-reference.simo…

I'm guessing, but can be because then the skill will always fetch the latest docs.

[flagged]

Re: ChatGPT Work Tool and Skill Reference

#26
post #13
post #8

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

How is this comment "spam"? Spell it out for me. (I think you may be confusing "spam" with "prolific". I write a lot.)

I think folks are a little too aggressive here but I know I typically have your posts muted by default for me simply because too often it was just blog spam about something you wrote before. I suspect the greater HN in net likes your work but there is a pretty wide spectrum and I would say you definitely blur the limits between spam and “prolific”.

Re: ChatGPT Work Tool and Skill Reference

#30
post #17
post #16

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Once again, continues to gaslight after spamming a post with another top-posted comment after having to “justify” it. In this case, You already admitted to it. There is just no end or need to rapidly post on every opportunity that involves “AI” or whatever that is related to it.

Seriously, what's your definition of spam? Or an easier question: how am I gaslighting here? You should be able to spell that out. (You do understand that the top linked site here was built by me, but has no authorship information on it at all, right? That's why I posted a comment explaining what it is.)

.. I know its tempting to try to reply to all these people but I'd just ignore them. A lot of them feel stressed by AI and it has nothing to do with you personally.
Post reply on HN