Live data from Hacker News

“I just chose words carefully”

unsung.aresluna.org

261–270 of 366 posts

Re: “I just chose words carefully”

#261
post #238
post #3

suckerpinch has a great video where he uses an LLM to do this same thing automatically https://tom7.org/bovex/

If you're reading this and you're put off by the "uses an LLM", don't be. This is not a low-effort video, quite the opposite. This is one of the best YouTube videos I have ever seen.

Tom7 doesn’t know the meaning of the phrase “low effort”.

Re: “I just chose words carefully”

#262
post #39

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think you meant "spelt" rather than spent. A but ironic, all things considered.

Now I'm wondering if you meant to use but instead of bit intentionally or not... I'm not great with subtle humor in writing.

You just never know these days. It could be a smartphone keyboard issue.

How much time should a person spend reviewing their comment before hitting reply?

There is a bar of quality each of us expects everyone else to follow. Sometimes we meet expectations, other times we ruffle feathers. How much should you even care?

If we all spew typos, you'll probably care less. If everyone else is carefully reviewing their posts, you might care.

In both cases, it makes no real difference unless the information being transferred is important to you (recipe, design doc, vs shitposts). How much mental friction can you tolerate?

Furthermroe, studeis shoew you can swap the arranrgment of most lettres (ecxept for the frist and last letetrs) in text and you stlil get the piont farily esaily.

Re: “I just chose words carefully”

#264

In programming certain word choices are valuable in this way. It's sad that pairs like true/false, good/bad, first/rest, and left/right are unequal length. But there are nice pairs like old/new, head/tail, fast/slow, same/diff, and right/wrong, which can help with create natural vertical alignment throughout a function.

up/dn is cute

Re: “I just chose words carefully”

#265
post #148

Earlier quoted context omitted.

In Japan they have the abbreviation “NG” (“not good”) that’s often used as the opposite of “OK”. I always liked how, when I worked for a Japanese machine learning company, classifiers would be between “OK” and “NG”. Maybe semantically “okay” and “not good” are not great opposites, but I always liked how having textual alignment makes the contrast immediately obvious

It's not unusual in France to use OK and KO. I never liked it much because it's too easy to confuse and no semantically a good opposite either, but visually it does look very balanced.

“SUCCÈS” and “ERREUR” work too.

Re: “I just chose words carefully”

#266
post #45

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Or Andrew Jackson approaching the problem from the other end. “It is a damn poor mind indeed which can't think of at least two ways to spell any word.” As a rather, well... "creative" speller I blame Webster for locking things down and ruining it for the rest of us.

I few years ago I saw a TV interview where some gen-z kid confidently stated: "the dictdionary is supposed to reflect how I talk, not the other was around."

What a rude approach! I will always prefer the more classic and civilized way of waiting for the dictionary to invent new words for me to use.

Re: “I just chose words carefully”

#267

In programming certain word choices are valuable in this way. It's sad that pairs like true/false, good/bad, first/rest, and left/right are unequal length. But there are nice pairs like old/new, head/tail, fast/slow, same/diff, and right/wrong, which can help with create natural vertical alignment throughout a function.

Ah, but I use a normal proportional font in my editor so same and diff have different widths. That was the fun comment. The serious ones: 1. I'm trading the ability to align statements on consecutive lines for a more pleasant reading experience. 2. Nobody ever complained that my source code is a = 1 ab = 2 abc = 3 instead of a = 1 ab = 2 abc = 3 3. No tables or diagrams in comments of course but I think that I could…

Code editors should do this visually without adding actual space characters to the file.

Re: “I just chose words carefully”

#268

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Now I'm wondering if you meant to use but instead of bit intentionally or not... I'm not great with subtle humor in writing.

You just never know these days. It could be a smartphone keyboard issue. How much time should a person spend reviewing their comment before hitting reply? There is a bar of quality each of us expects everyone else to follow. Sometimes we meet expectations, other times we ruffle feathers. How much should you even care? If we all spew typos, you'll probably care less. If everyone else is carefully reviewing their posts…

Actual story: https://www.reddit.com/r/movies/comments/39i30p/harvey_weins...

Re: “I just chose words carefully”

#269

In a similar vein, Taylor Otwell from Laravel writes his comment blocks exactly three lines long and each line is three characters shorter than the line above, e.g. /* |-------------------------------------------------------------------------- | Application Name |-------------------------------------------------------------------------- | | This value is the name of your application, which will be used when the | fra…

comment by him on a podcast [1]: "Started doing the 3-line comments just for visual appeal, became an iconic part of Laravel over time. And then I just kept rolling with it, and it became like a a [sic] Laravel meme of sorts."

[1] https://syntax.fm/show/824/taylor-otwell-s-opinions-on-php-r...

Re: “I just chose words carefully”

#270

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Widows are when the final line of a paragraph starts the next page. Orphans are when the first line of a paragraph ends a page.

You will have to explain what a page is to the younger readers.

Surely they know the concept of a book
Post reply on HN