Live data from Hacker News

Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope

science.nasa.gov

111–115 of 115 posts

Re: Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope

#111

I will never understand why NASA doesn't build at least two copies of expensive space telescopes like this. One single launch failure and boom (literally), the entire project is a failure? It wouldn't double the cost assuming they do it with even a modicum of efficiency and intelligence. And hey - assuming that the launch goes smoothly, you can get double the benefit

what if both of them blow up?

Stage 2 FTS is safed!

Bon Voyage, RST!

Re: Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope

#112

The data, up to 1.4TB/day raw compressed, is planned to be fully open, every observation is public as soon as it is processed with no embargo. You can just download it and start looking for Rama or Oumuamua or plan your exoplanetary real estate empire or make a really big sandbox game. I at least want somebody to make me a cool screen saver. You could easily be the first person to see a galaxy. I wonder how much spac…

> I wonder how much space exploration could be financed by auctioning off naming rights.

My favorite part about this is that since names are largely a social construct, given the right situation, we could just nullify all the paid names and start again.

Sure, whoever does this will lose a lot of credibility. But say a disliked president signs an order forcing his country to stop accepting names that were paid, it only takes nobody reinstating it. And the rest of the world also giving up on the names, of course.

So you can totally fund space exploration this way, and then society can decide that it sucked and nullify it after the buyer is dead and unable to protest. I guess the family could, but...

Re: Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope

#113

I will never understand why NASA doesn't build at least two copies of expensive space telescopes like this. One single launch failure and boom (literally), the entire project is a failure? It wouldn't double the cost assuming they do it with even a modicum of efficiency and intelligence. And hey - assuming that the launch goes smoothly, you can get double the benefit

[dead]

Re: Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope

#114
post #81

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Thank you! From talking to a contact working with JWST, it sounds a bit trickier in practice. The data are public, but with Roman the idea is that you must process them on their computers rather than download everything locally, and you pay for the compute/storage you use.

that's horrifying! what if you want to work on the processing algorithms themselves? can't you access the raw input data?

The questions is, how much are you willing to pay (because the cost of this is not free, especially in this cloud era), and what is the scientific return for access to the uncalibrated data? There is significantly more value in a well designed pipeline for everyone (which is where anyone who would work on the pipeline would slot in) than bespoke pipelines which are poorly built and unmaintainable.
Post reply on HN