Startup Anti-Patterns
itamarnovick.com
Startup Anti-Patterns
1–10 of 102 posts
Re: Startup Anti-Patterns
#2Scalability is not a problem: you have, you will have, you should plan for, you should build for, nor allow anyone to utter the S word. Simplicity is the correct word to use.
Re: Startup Anti-Patterns
#3"Pretending you are Google" Needs to be on there. Scalability is not a problem: you have, you will have, you should plan for, you should build for, nor allow anyone to utter the S word. Simplicity is the correct word to use.
Software Devs love solving pretend problems, and the state of modern web development reflects this.
Re: Startup Anti-Patterns
#4Re: Startup Anti-Patterns
#5"Pretending you are Google" Needs to be on there. Scalability is not a problem: you have, you will have, you should plan for, you should build for, nor allow anyone to utter the S word. Simplicity is the correct word to use.
Re: Startup Anti-Patterns
#6"Pretending you are Google" Needs to be on there. Scalability is not a problem: you have, you will have, you should plan for, you should build for, nor allow anyone to utter the S word. Simplicity is the correct word to use.
Re: Startup Anti-Patterns
#7Nodejs + typescript is superior across almost every dimension other than data science and familiarity.
People think it’s apples and oranges but it’s not. Also don’t forget golang too.
If your app is Python in the beginning then you’re pretty much locked in. It’s doable, but you’re going to be dealing with a lot of Python specific warts.
Re: Startup Anti-Patterns
#8"Pretending you are Google" Needs to be on there. Scalability is not a problem: you have, you will have, you should plan for, you should build for, nor allow anyone to utter the S word. Simplicity is the correct word to use.
This falls into a broader category of disillusionment: "Pretend problems are the funnnest ones to solve", meaning, when the problem doesn't actually exist, any solution can be leveraged as the "right" one because there is no real world backpressure to test if it's effective. Software Devs love solving pretend problems, and the state of modern web development reflects this.
Are you kidding, have you seen the C programming language?!
Re: Startup Anti-Patterns
#9"Pretending you are Google" Needs to be on there. Scalability is not a problem: you have, you will have, you should plan for, you should build for, nor allow anyone to utter the S word. Simplicity is the correct word to use.
This falls into a broader category of disillusionment: "Pretend problems are the funnnest ones to solve", meaning, when the problem doesn't actually exist, any solution can be leveraged as the "right" one because there is no real world backpressure to test if it's effective. Software Devs love solving pretend problems, and the state of modern web development reflects this.
It also gives you a lot more free time if you can persuade your employer to let you use cutting edge technology rather than needing to save it for your side projects after hours.
Plus, given how many startups fail, you do kinda need a backup plan...
So, I suspect a lot of companies are... encouraged to aim for scale and encouraged to tackle problems in the most overcomplicated way possible so that the people working there can take their experience to Alphabet/Meta/Apple/whatever if things go south.
Re: Startup Anti-Patterns
#10"Pretending you are Google" Needs to be on there. Scalability is not a problem: you have, you will have, you should plan for, you should build for, nor allow anyone to utter the S word. Simplicity is the correct word to use.
This falls into a broader category of disillusionment: "Pretend problems are the funnnest ones to solve", meaning, when the problem doesn't actually exist, any solution can be leveraged as the "right" one because there is no real world backpressure to test if it's effective. Software Devs love solving pretend problems, and the state of modern web development reflects this.
I think it's more that people are attracted to tractable problems. We like to follow certain paths that are well-worn, where the next step is visible and easy to see. And whether those paths lead to a pretend/pointless destination is, surprisingly, irrelevant. They're easier to follow than whacking our way through the brush.