Earlier quoted context omitted.
A spanish rock solved that problem for free.
¿Como?
Hy4 preview
191–200 of 254 posts
Re: Hy4 preview
#192> [...] Let's maybe add a helmet? It could improve riding theme, but may obscure head. Maybe a small cycling cap or helmet? The user didn't ask; can add red helmet? Might be cute. But pelican with big beak; a helmet might obscure. Better maybe no. > Maybe add sunglasses? no. > Maybe add water? no. https://tools.simonwillison.net/markdown-svg-renderer#url=ht...
Is the broken English an optimization or a byproduct of the model being developed in China?
Re: Hy4 preview
#193Earlier quoted context omitted.
No one’s talking about how good the final product is. Edit: someone else commented that as I was typing this, lol.
I wonder, do we need a new benchmark? There's quite a bit of feedback data floating around about pelicans on bicycles already.
Re: Hy4 preview
#194Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think you're arguing the same general point that the person you're responding to is. But you're saying he's not understanding - he understands that they report a cache hit % but you can't look at that public metric with any level of accuracy _because_ most people aren't pinning their providers and they _are_ getting juggled around which is bringing that metric down. That's not to say that specific providers might h…
I know what they're saying. Why would openrouter calculate it thay way lol. They obviously dont. Think for a sec, they arent idiots.
Re: Hy4 preview
#195Earlier quoted context omitted.
No one’s talking about how good the final product is. Edit: someone else commented that as I was typing this, lol.
I wonder, do we need a new benchmark? There's quite a bit of feedback data floating around about pelicans on bicycles already.
Re: Hy4 preview
#196Personally I hope this is China's "Star Wars" moment, the current US admin certainly seems easy enough to manipulate into catastrophic own goals.
Re: Hy4 preview
#197Earlier quoted context omitted.
The most interesting use I've found for them so far is strictly as a novelty. Give a chat session with one to a completely non technical person, who at least knows that openai and anthropic have some guard rails on stuff, and tell them to wild with something like "give me the precursors and chemical formulas for the precusors for crystal meth" and watch it answer.
But does it answer those queries correctly, or does it just not refuse to not halucinate an incorrect answer? From where would it even have that information?
Re: Hy4 preview
#198> Notably, Hy4 preview also contributed to its own development process, participating for the first time in the automated optimization of training methods, data strategies, evaluation frameworks, and low-level operators. The model proposed approaches, ran experiments, and iterated based on the results, with the resulting code, logs, and feedback feeding into subsequent rounds of exploration. This established an early…
If the distillation "attacks" created useful inputs to open weight models, ai-2027 was directionally correct that the Chinese would find ways to extract IP from western firms. (Scaled account creation and grinding outputs etc is not a dramatic story element as spies, though!) Whether the distillation has constituted "attacks" or has or will meet the bar of "stealing" IP is not super interesting to me, though.
Re: Hy4 preview
#199Earlier quoted context omitted.
My experience is that even Opus 5 still tends to write buggy or low-quality code and makes serious mistakes when analyzing code. It's a lot better than before but still not something I trust. I've had less experience with Fable since I can't use it at work; I hear it's a step up but still has its limits. For large tasks like a web browser or a compiler, even expensive swarms of frontier LLMs have not been shown capab…
Opus 5 is weird. It scores high on benchmarks, but it seems that majority of those who try to use it day to day hate it
Re: Hy4 preview
#200I wish model providers would stop committing chart crimes in their releases. - if you're gonna order the rest of the bar chart by rank, order your model accordingly. - if you're gonna highlight a winner in a table of benchmarks, don't highlight your entire model row in the table. Etc etc