Earlier quoted context omitted.
Not a victory, Android is still covered.
Hard to argue that it's open source...
California lawmakers unanimously pass Linux exemption from age-verification law
11–20 of 409 posts
Re: California lawmakers unanimously pass Linux exemption from age-verification law
#12Re: California lawmakers unanimously pass Linux exemption from age-verification law
#13Weird how the people who habitually complain about government are conspicuously silent when it delivers something they wanted.
Re: California lawmakers unanimously pass Linux exemption from age-verification law
#14Weird how the people who habitually complain about government are conspicuously silent when it delivers something they wanted.
Re: California lawmakers unanimously pass Linux exemption from age-verification law
#15Re: California lawmakers unanimously pass Linux exemption from age-verification law
#16Weird how the people who habitually complain about government are conspicuously silent when it delivers something they wanted.
Re: California lawmakers unanimously pass Linux exemption from age-verification law
#17Re: California lawmakers unanimously pass Linux exemption from age-verification law
#18Weird how the people who habitually complain about government are conspicuously silent when it delivers something they wanted.
Re: California lawmakers unanimously pass Linux exemption from age-verification law
#19And now a bunch of OSI-Approved licenses get to have special rules applied to them, entrenching them and killing further innovation.
> a person or entity that distributes an operating system or application under license terms that permit a recipient to copy, redistribute, and modify the software
which at least doesn't choose specific winners and losers among licenses. It does disfavor license-free and public domain software, which isn't great.
Re: California lawmakers unanimously pass Linux exemption from age-verification law
#20And then further into the text it's clarified that there also isn't a specific list of open licenses, as the terrible headline would have you believe, but instead a description of what is considered open
With the caveat that I haven't read the actual legal text, this seems to be an eminently sensible law (it'd be better if it weren't needed, but here we are).
In summary: not a Linux exemption, and not an exemption for a specific list of licenses either.