Live data from Hacker News

Tether: iMessage, SMS, etc. on Linux

zackbartel.com

101–110 of 231 posts

Re: Tether: iMessage, SMS, etc. on Linux

#102

Mega-kudos to the author for chipping away at the wall around Apple’s garden. I have had a iPhone for 15 years, and I have only ever been able to back it up with iTunes on windows (as I will never buy a Mac). Apple’s refusal to provide interoperability borders on criminal. I wish there was a better option.

You mean the same Apple, who supports RCS, and historically supported open protocols?

As to iMessage, think carefully about the architecture, and maybe you can imagine why it is Apple only.

Re: Tether: iMessage, SMS, etc. on Linux

#103

Dependencies: ...wayland-client... Nuts, I'm on xfce, and don't intend to switch over until it's necessary. Why is Wayland necessary for this?

I mean... if you wanna keep using xorg, more power to you. But you can't expect developers to keep supporting it. Isn't XFCE moving to Wayland soon anyway?

Re: Tether: iMessage, SMS, etc. on Linux

#104

Mega-kudos to the author for chipping away at the wall around Apple’s garden. I have had a iPhone for 15 years, and I have only ever been able to back it up with iTunes on windows (as I will never buy a Mac). Apple’s refusal to provide interoperability borders on criminal. I wish there was a better option.

You mean the same Apple, who supports RCS, and historically supported open protocols? As to iMessage, think carefully about the architecture, and maybe you can imagine why it is Apple only.

As a fanboy I can admit rcs came with them kicking and screaming against it.

Re: Tether: iMessage, SMS, etc. on Linux

#106

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You mean the same Apple, who supports RCS, and historically supported open protocols? As to iMessage, think carefully about the architecture, and maybe you can imagine why it is Apple only.

As a fanboy I can admit rcs came with them kicking and screaming against it.

didn't it take legal threats from the EU to ultimately make it happen?

Re: Tether: iMessage, SMS, etc. on Linux

#107

Mega-kudos to the author for chipping away at the wall around Apple’s garden. I have had a iPhone for 15 years, and I have only ever been able to back it up with iTunes on windows (as I will never buy a Mac). Apple’s refusal to provide interoperability borders on criminal. I wish there was a better option.

I'm shouting into the wind here a fair amount, but I just discovered DeltaChat and ArcaneChat. ArcaneChat is available only on Android, but DeltaChat is available on iOS and uses chatmail relays. My family has found it to be super useful and effective. I don't think it's viable to convert everybody in my social circle, but I've been very happy with the apps and attachments, notifications, and general performance. htt…

DeltaChat was much more useful when it worked with any email server and didn't need its own special kind of server. We have plenty of messengers that use their own servers, like matrix, XMPP, and simplex.

Re: Tether: iMessage, SMS, etc. on Linux

#108
Sorry if this is obvious, but does it use the same thing OpenBubbles does? What's nice about that is that it just hooks directly into Apple's servers, so doesn't require a connection to your phone or anything.

Re: Tether: iMessage, SMS, etc. on Linux

#109

Dependencies: ...wayland-client... Nuts, I'm on xfce, and don't intend to switch over until it's necessary. Why is Wayland necessary for this?

We really need a WaylandX, don't we? It shouldn't be that hard to make, since Wayland is a very limited protocol...

I can't think of an ideological reason that apps shouldn't require Wayland that wouldn't apply to anything else. Isn't it just as bad for an app to require X11 or to require Linux or to require Windows or to require Android? You are free to port it to X11 or any other platform.

Re: Tether: iMessage, SMS, etc. on Linux

#110

Wasn't there another iMessage clone for Linux/Android a few years back and they got a C&D from Apple? Or maybe Apple just blocked their service?

As a general rule, Apple will shut down an operator of such service once it gets used to pump out spam. Of course, every spammer dreams of their spam texts coming through as a blue bubble.

What if there is no operator?
Post reply on HN