Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Our decision on Cursor following its acquisition by SpaceX

openai.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

451–460 of 532 posts

Re: Our decision on Cursor following its acquisition by SpaceX

#451

Post by germandiago »

slfnflctd wrote: post #326
germandiago wrote: post #200

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I am pretty sure that the goal of these companies at the end is ruling more than what governments can. Just look at the pattern... they collude, they provide to them whatever is needed, and at some point, if this is not true yet, they will be the ones who will tell them what to do or not, bc you know how humans are, right... blackmailing, mess up the business or shames of people, etc. It is just a matter of time. The…

> It is just a matter of time. The state, as we know it, will collapse or will be greatly reduced Doubt. The networking between people in power at the top will, in my opinion, most likely assure that they remain in power, because at the end of the day that is what they want most. I expect government will seize control of the most advanced models (if they haven't already), and the rest of us will be throttled, and sta…

There will be a moment where the government will depend so much on the tech that if the tech cuts the supply, they are f...

Who do you think will rule at that point? They just cannot fight that, they do not have the technology these companies have.

Re: Our decision on Cursor following its acquisition by SpaceX

#452

Post by germandiago »

deadbabe wrote: post #252
germandiago wrote: post #200

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I am pretty sure that the goal of these companies at the end is ruling more than what governments can. Just look at the pattern... they collude, they provide to them whatever is needed, and at some point, if this is not true yet, they will be the ones who will tell them what to do or not, bc you know how humans are, right... blackmailing, mess up the business or shames of people, etc. It is just a matter of time. The…

And then powerful local LLMs become feasible and everyone and every government self hosts and the megacorps lose all power. Imagine the United States DoD, CIA, NSA training an LLM on all its top secret intel.

A great idea that each person does the same. That makes it a draw, namely, a Nash equilibrium.

Re: Our decision on Cursor following its acquisition by SpaceX

#453

Post by david-gpu »

delecti wrote: post #431
david-gpu wrote: post #428

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Standard copyright boilerplate. Not terms of service distinct from copyright, which is the subject of this thread.

If you read the whole copyright page of a book and come away with the conclusion that it's anything but terms of use for the book, then we'll just have to agree to disagree.

The thread is about terms of use separate from copyright law. It is the whole premise.

Re: Our decision on Cursor following its acquisition by SpaceX

#454

Post by carlbarrdahl »

jackjeff wrote: post #194

Is there some kind of alternative to Cursor in these terms - fast because the code is already indexed no need to start every prompt rediscovering the world with rg - in editor/vscode review much better than relying on git diff at the very end. You can click on next button to jump there. Quick edit in place. Or a quick prompt (seconds) to fix something small - in editor completion / quick edits, when you do things by…

I met the founder of Voidleap (https://voidleap.com) yesterday! They have been building a new type of code editor since early this year and has been dogfooding it themselves.

I haven't tried it yet but it looks promising. He would be thrilled if people give it a go!

Re: Our decision on Cursor following its acquisition by SpaceX

#455

Post by david-gpu »

paradox460 wrote: post #430
david-gpu wrote: post #277

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How long until books come with TOS, then?

They kind of do. There's usually a big scary notice on the imprint page scolding you for even thinking about piracy

We are talking of TOS independent of copyright law.

Re: Our decision on Cursor following its acquisition by SpaceX

#456

Post by redox99 »

mirzap wrote: post #185
redox99 wrote: post #9

It's always been clear to me that Cursor's business model of reselling others' APIs had its days numbered. Not necessarily because the providers would pull the plug, but because you wouldn't be able to compete with subsidized plans. Cursor is already kind of useless for third party models unless you're willing to spend thousands of dollars. It's only worth it if you're going to use mostly grok/composer.

Why do people keep insisting that subscription plans are subsidized? They are not. API prices are outrageous, designed to milk enterprise users. They probably have an 80-90% profit margin on subscription plans. Inference is cheap; Dax once said on a podcast that Opencode has a close to 90% profit margin on the openweight models it provides inference for (at 10x cheaper pricing). Those models are close in size and spe…

Because using chinese models on OpenRouter is way more expensive than the equivalent codex sub, unless you use something clearly inferior like deepseek flash.

Re: Our decision on Cursor following its acquisition by SpaceX

#458

Post by KuriousCat »

cornholio wrote: post #167
rgbrenner wrote: post #32

Anthropic already banned xAI for very similar ToS violations earlier this year: https://x.com/kyliebytes/status/2009686466746822731?s=46 So this is OpenAI following suit after Musk admitted to distilling their models. This was bound to happen once Cursor decided to sell itself to a competing model provider. It'll be interesting to see if Anthropic applies their ban to Cursor, or if that datacenter deal they signed wi…

It's ironic how AI companies are re-inventing their own form of privately enforced copyright, lobby the government to ban foreign competitors that don't respect it etc., all while spending the last 5 years fighting tooth and nail against the copyright of the training material they're using. If you can take any book and turn it into a model, because it's "transformative enough", and "AI learns just like a person does"…

They cannot reliably enforce copyright, so they fall back on terms of service and deplatforming.

Re: Our decision on Cursor following its acquisition by SpaceX

#459

Post by hamdingers »

RetpolineDrama wrote: post #445
jurgenburgen wrote: post #286

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> It seems that everyone loves agentic Claude code things these days but I don’t understand how you can review what it did and remain as much in the flow as you do with cursor. The way I review it is to let it finish a PR sized slice and then I review the whole diff in a separate terminal as if it’s a PR from someone else. Then I very impolitely list the shit that needs fixing, let the LLM grind out a new batch and r…

>The way I review it is to let it finish a PR sized slice and then I review the whole diff in a separate terminal as if it’s a PR from someone else. Insanely inefficient. It's 10x more productive to watch the thinking traces and edits in real time and steer the model appropriately. If your workflow is typical no wonder my team members who use claude code are so much less productive.

Do you never have agents working on multiple tasks in parallel? You'll become much more productive when you figure out how to stop micromanaging.

Re: Our decision on Cursor following its acquisition by SpaceX

#460

Post by 293725903 »

mikeyouse wrote: post #67
skeledrew wrote: post #31

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Still, where's the legalese? I'd expect something like this on an individual's blog, not a company's.

They can skip the legalese because Musk had testified under oath that Grok was distilling OpenAI models while Elon was on the board of OpenAI. https://www.theverge.com/ai-artificial-intelligence/921546/e...

[dead]
Post reply on HN