Bummed, but I guess for me, doesn't mean cursor subscription ending though. Grok is a pretty amazing model for the speed and price on Cursor.
Does Grok have a subscription that competes with Claude Max $100 plan (genuinely curious)
Our decision on Cursor following its acquisition by SpaceX
81–90 of 522 posts
Re: Our decision on Cursor following its acquisition by SpaceX
#82This is personal, not business.
Re: Our decision on Cursor following its acquisition by SpaceX
#83While this isn't great for users it seems like a pretty standard circling of the wagons in preparation for the next phase in the battle for frontier AI dominance. Ironically, as a Cursor and Claude subscriber, but not an OpenAI subscriber, this will push me back to Anthropic. I don't feel good about giving OpenAI money directly, but I've found switching to GPT 5.6 Sol now and again in Cursor to be useful. Now I'll pr…
Why would you possibly allow companies to push you? You are the customer and you should control which models you use.
Because one is better or worse? What else do you think they meant?
Re: Our decision on Cursor following its acquisition by SpaceX
#84I guess I’m on the right track. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49428835 If Claude pulls away from Cursor as well then Cursor is basically done.
All good points. However, it's not a safe assumption that everyone operates that way. People probably use the flagship models because that's what they know. Sure, some probably just use the default, in this case Grok.
Also, it's a signal more than anything. OpenAI pulls out of Cursor. Then Anthropic and Google does as well. Then you no longer have "Cursor" you have Grok.
Grok doesn't have the best reputation in general, regardless if you're tech savvy or not.
Re: Our decision on Cursor following its acquisition by SpaceX
#85Damn; Cursor has basically no value if Anthropic pulls the same move. Twitter Part 2 indeed.
Re: Our decision on Cursor following its acquisition by SpaceX
#86i don't see the point of cursor when vsc + codex extension does the same thing. i don't use autocomplete anymore (who writes code anymore? lol) any and anyone using grok unironically is also probably a moron.
i only tell VC type people or others from whom i want something "oh yeah grok is cool" if they mention it, because they're always sucking off Elon
Re: Our decision on Cursor following its acquisition by SpaceX
#87Damn; Cursor has basically no value if Anthropic pulls the same move. Twitter Part 2 indeed.
Anthropic rents a lot of capacity from xAI, so I don't think they're in a position to do the same.
Re: Our decision on Cursor following its acquisition by SpaceX
#88Anthropic already banned xAI for very similar ToS violations earlier this year: https://x.com/kyliebytes/status/2009686466746822731?s=46 So this is OpenAI following suit after Musk admitted to distilling their models. This was bound to happen once Cursor decided to sell itself to a competing model provider. It'll be interesting to see if Anthropic applies their ban to Cursor, or if that datacenter deal they signed wi…
Anthropic seems to have no issues: https://x.com/NotTomBrown/status/2093541294027280657?s=20
Re: Our decision on Cursor following its acquisition by SpaceX
#89It's always been clear to me that Cursor's business model of reselling others' APIs had its days numbered. Not necessarily because the providers would pull the plug, but because you wouldn't be able to compete with subsidized plans. Cursor is already kind of useless for third party models unless you're willing to spend thousands of dollars. It's only worth it if you're going to use mostly grok/composer.
I will slightly disagree on a small slice: Their harness/instruction makes Opus/Fable so much better to work with.
Honestly, _this_ was their moat more than Composer to me.
Re: Our decision on Cursor following its acquisition by SpaceX
#90This low key confirms Astra for November