> Note that attributes like hx-disinherit Looks like some copy is missing here
Yep, fixed
Htmx 4.0
11–20 of 223 posts
Re: Htmx 4.0
#12Re: Htmx 4.0
#13[deleted]
Re: Htmx 4.0
#14Re: Htmx 4.0
#15Why did they skip version 3?
Re: Htmx 4.0
#16Congrats and thanks! htmx brings me joy. Pretty much every experiment I build now starts with Go, htmx, and SQLite to keep things simple and fast but still responsive. I put a few more thoughts about this here: https://housecat.com/blog/the-hugs-stack-hypermedia-unix-go-...
Oh wow, interesting combo that I would never independently reach for, but thanks to your template I might have to give it a whirl!
Re: Htmx 4.0
#17Congratulations on the release!
I have enjoyed working with htmx very much.
I'm still skeptical of htmx being the foundation for a 100-year web service, but I think this is a really worthwhile goal. I'll add that aside from static HTML, I don't have a better option.
Re: Htmx 4.0
#18I've always been a fan and supporter of HTMX, but lately I've wondered how beneficial it is now that LLMs can generate JavaScript for us. HTMX was especially useful when I wrote JavaScript by hand because I appreciated its higher level of abstraction and simplicity. I also struggled to make it work with AlpineJS and eventually had to resort to plain JavaScript, which gave me finer control. Normally, switching to JavaScript would have been a hassle but since an LLM can produce it as easily as any other text, I’m less clear on HTMX’s advantage. I’ve been getting along fine without it. If computers didn’t write code for us, I would still choose HTMX, but now I find it hard to justify the trade‑off.
Re: Htmx 4.0
#19I'm not very familiar with htmx but at first glance it seems similar to Angular. I thought Angular lost favor because of all the extra attributes and boilerplate. What makes htmx different?
Re: Htmx 4.0
#20Before vibe coding was a thing, HTMX made it super easy for me to implement Ajax like features. It was the most approachable library I've ever seen, and I'll always be grateful for it.