GLM-5.3 is now open-weight
11–20 of 296 posts
Re: GLM-5.3 is now open-weight
#12I've been using it more and more. Feels like Opus 4.8, in the best possible way.
I'm starting to think Opus 4.8 is significantly smaller than most people assume. If it's significantly larger than GLM 5.3 (I've heard some insane guesstimates out there like upwards of 5T params or more), that would prove rather embarrassing for Anthropic.
Re: GLM-5.3 is now open-weight
#13GLM-5.3-Flash is actually cheaper than deepseek and better than deepseek but no one is talking about yet :)
Re: GLM-5.3 is now open-weight
#14GLM-5.3-Flash is actually cheaper than deepseek and better than deepseek but no one is talking about yet :)
I've been using it quite a bit too. My main complaint is that it can be really slow sometimes — like, really slow — and the speed feels pretty inconsistent.
There are other providers with much faster inference, like BaseTen at >100t/s: https://openrouter.ai/z-ai/glm-5.3-flash#performance
Re: GLM-5.3 is now open-weight
#15I've been using it more and more. Feels like Opus 4.8, in the best possible way.
I'm starting to think Opus 4.8 is significantly smaller than most people assume. If it's significantly larger than GLM 5.3 (I've heard some insane guesstimates out there like upwards of 5T params or more), that would prove rather embarrassing for Anthropic.
I feel like most benchmarks cluster on a reasonably limited area of human knowledge
Re: GLM-5.3 is now open-weight
#16Assuming you’re willing to drop a fat stack of cash on the upcoming Mac m5 ultra with 512 gb unified memory, you can even run it locally, quantized to 4 bit. Whether it’s even slightly reasonable, well, my wife would probably skin me alive but maybe yours is more understanding.
Re: GLM-5.3 is now open-weight
#17I've been using it more and more. Feels like Opus 4.8, in the best possible way.
Re: GLM-5.3 is now open-weight
#18Re: GLM-5.3 is now open-weight
#19Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm starting to think Opus 4.8 is significantly smaller than most people assume. If it's significantly larger than GLM 5.3 (I've heard some insane guesstimates out there like upwards of 5T params or more), that would prove rather embarrassing for Anthropic.
You can't compare models released 6+ months apart. GLM 5.2 was same architecture as 5.3 and not nearly as good. Takes time to build frontier intelligence and distill down to smaller sizes.
Re: GLM-5.3 is now open-weight
#20GLM 5.3 is probably the sweet spot open weights model if you want to go beyond deepseek flash or the new glm flash. I used it with pi and had a fairly good time, especially since it’s less touchy about cyber and whatnot than the US guys. It’s slightly behind Kimi in ability but it’s a lot easier to run it, I’d expect prices (and speed!) from third parties to be noticeably better. Assuming you’re willing to drop a fat…