Live data from Hacker News

Welcome to Quartz

qz.com

11–20 of 38 posts

Re: Welcome to Quartz

#11

This is UI madness, things hides, moves and pop around with no obvious relation with my input. The main news timeline is promising though, but greatly needs visual codes for differentiating and qualifying content. It's great to focus on the content while not putting technology asides, but your publishing tool is also of strategical importance. It's great to have rethought the general way of showing information, but t…

Agree, it's awful.

Re: Welcome to Quartz

#12
I hope it's not written in the same code these guys are using!

OK, that was a bit snarky, but this site's design definitely feels too "clever" and, weirdly, looks like something that might have escaped from a time tunnel to 2006. Since then, everyone has got into the whole minimalism thing, and web design has generally been better for it.

Re: Welcome to Quartz

#13
Reading a manifesto is probably not a good introduction to the site — it's a bit "tell" instead of "show".

Submitted to news.ycombinator about ten hours ago, the qz.com "Check your US tax rate for 2012-and every year since 1913" might show a little bit more of the kind of interactive blah responsive blah storytelling multifluidic blah they aim to do: http://qz.com/37639/check-your-us-tax-rate-for-2012-and-ever...

Re: Welcome to Quartz

#14
The future of news has nothing to do with code. That's just "when all you have is a hammer" talk. We're already trending towards Facebook-ized/Twitter-ized news, and I don't think anyone is impressed. The problem with the news is content, and the people, and I don't think technology is going to help with either.

As an aside, I just bought a subscription to Bloomberg Businessweek on my iPad (first newspaper subscription ever) and I have to say I'm impressed. Quality long-form writing, covering business and Wall Street without the conservative slant of fellatious tone of the WSJ. Very recommended.

Re: Welcome to Quartz

#15
The future of news certainly is not UI code. Code is definitely important for reporting, but much more so for analysis and much less so for delivery. If the NY Times (or anyone else) uses code to crunch through millions of records and finds an important story out of it, I will read that story in whatever format they publish in. If it's not some whiz bang "tablet optimized" CMS, I don't care at all. If I am readying your tablet optimized news site and you don't have the important stories, I will stop reading.

tl;dr it's the content, stupid.

Re: Welcome to Quartz

#16

I think the UI needs a lot of work. When I think of the future of news, I think of something like Mashable's latest UI (which I personally think is quite beautiful). One comment - when I look at the top bar (side note: the automatic slide is jarring and unnatural IMO), I see titles like "Low Interest Rates". That makes me think of spam/advertisements. Another one: "The Next Crisis"? Again, makes me think of spam. I h…

I don't really see how Mashable's UI is in any way new or different. The same sidebar overdose and jumble of unrelated content thrown together on a page. Maybe it's just wishful thinking on my part, but eventually I think publishers will figure out that simpler is better. (Also see http://dashes.com/anil/2012/08/stop-publishing-web-pages.htm...) And Quartz, although there's a couple of kinks in their app, is a step in that direction.

Also, you're probably not their target audience. For someone who reads business news, those "spammy" topic titles you talk about are all things e.g. a Wall Street Journal reader is familiar with and cares about.

Re: Welcome to Quartz

#17

This is UI madness, things hides, moves and pop around with no obvious relation with my input. The main news timeline is promising though, but greatly needs visual codes for differentiating and qualifying content. It's great to focus on the content while not putting technology asides, but your publishing tool is also of strategical importance. It's great to have rethought the general way of showing information, but t…

Yea I kinda feel bad for them. They have all these smart looking people on the about page, but the UI is so terrible.

Re: Welcome to Quartz

#18

This is UI madness, things hides, moves and pop around with no obvious relation with my input. The main news timeline is promising though, but greatly needs visual codes for differentiating and qualifying content. It's great to focus on the content while not putting technology asides, but your publishing tool is also of strategical importance. It's great to have rethought the general way of showing information, but t…

The animation that makes the header disappear is kind of weird, but what other UI madness are you referring to?

Re: Welcome to Quartz

#19

This is UI madness, things hides, moves and pop around with no obvious relation with my input. The main news timeline is promising though, but greatly needs visual codes for differentiating and qualifying content. It's great to focus on the content while not putting technology asides, but your publishing tool is also of strategical importance. It's great to have rethought the general way of showing information, but t…

qz.com is the only site that made it to my router's "block sites" list just because of their awful and random UI.

Re: Welcome to Quartz

#20

This is UI madness, things hides, moves and pop around with no obvious relation with my input. The main news timeline is promising though, but greatly needs visual codes for differentiating and qualifying content. It's great to focus on the content while not putting technology asides, but your publishing tool is also of strategical importance. It's great to have rethought the general way of showing information, but t…

The animation that makes the header disappear is kind of weird, but what other UI madness are you referring to?

The most annoying is that scrolling can change the article without warning, and scrolling in the opposite direction may or may not return you to the article you actually wanted to read. Maybe it depends on the browser, but I have the same behavior on the Android browser and desktop Firefox.
Post reply on HN