Rubio Uses Terrorism Law to Ban Secure Email Service

This is the future that is unfolding and yet there is an alarming number of people who are still being dismissive.

The mentioned entity is making accusations: the point could be that an authoritative institutional judgement is missing (at list in the article) to establish a responsibility.

In fact, the target's rebuttal was «false allegations made by a politically desperate administration with the sole intention of swaying people and media attention away from their own violence and warmongering».

> our civilization

The mentioned entity is making boasting statements: again more justifications should be provided in order to make the stated less perplexing.

In 2030: "You have DeltaChat installed on your GrapheneOS phone? Why would you use that unless you're a terrorist? Good citizens use government-blessed choices, like Signal and iPhone once they passed the Freedom2029 compliance mandate."

It is clearly not just that, pls see the article and the allegation.

> Why would you use that unless you're a terrorist?

It is already like this: "why would you want privacy, what do you have to hide?" is often repeated.

Just think of the push towards cashless, in some areas cash is considered antisocial: I have seen fools that should be humble frown in front of it, silently screaming that "every good citizen sends his practices to the twelve largely anonymous private-public data collectors established by european law (and through monetic from the USA)" - the manipulation of the ignorant, in which vilty becomes pride...