Please stop flooding our projects with AI slop to furnish your CV
neilalexander.dev
Please stop flooding our projects with AI slop to furnish your CV
1–10 of 162 posts
Re: Please stop flooding our projects with AI slop to furnish your CV
#2Re: Please stop flooding our projects with AI slop to furnish your CV
#3I think the author meant 'burnish' there, which is a clever way of showing they didn't use AI :-)
Re: Please stop flooding our projects with AI slop to furnish your CV
#4Re: Please stop flooding our projects with AI slop to furnish your CV
#5So do you have the project’s best interest at heart or not? If you’re more concerned about the intent of a valid contribution than the content, why don’t you ask yourself where your intent is? You rejected a valid contribution based on unverified vibes about the person’s intent, instead of assuming they were just being helpful.
Re: Please stop flooding our projects with AI slop to furnish your CV
#6Obviously the best way to use AI to furnish your CV is to build your own project using AI.
Re: Please stop flooding our projects with AI slop to furnish your CV
#7I think the author meant 'burnish' there, which is a clever way of showing they didn't use AI :-)
Re: Please stop flooding our projects with AI slop to furnish your CV
#8AI is destroying trust in open source and many other areas and I think this will discourage teams from publishing their source code in the future.
On the other hand, personal connections are becoming even more important, which is unfair to the younger generation and people who don't live near tech hubs.
Re: Please stop flooding our projects with AI slop to furnish your CV
#9This is weird though. Obviously the best way to use AI to furnish your CV is to build your own project using AI.
Re: Please stop flooding our projects with AI slop to furnish your CV
#10> The changes were harmless and correct, but that did not make me feel better about accepting or merging them. So do you have the project’s best interest at heart or not? If you’re more concerned about the intent of a valid contribution than the content, why don’t you ask yourself where your intent is? You rejected a valid contribution based on unverified vibes about the person’s intent, instead of assuming they were…